The Franciscans of the Immaculate can ask the Commissar if the books on Vatican Council II can be done away with since they were written with a False Premise

 

The Franciscans of the Immaculate can ask the Commissar Fr. Sabino Ardito sdb and Canonical Consultant Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj if the books on Vatican Council II in general can be dispensed with . Since they have been written with a False Premise, Inference and non traditional conclusion.

This would include the books of Pope Benedict , Cardinal Kasper and Cardinal Semararo but also those of Fr. Serafino Lanzetta, Moms.Brunero Gherardino and Roberto dei Mattei.They all interpreted Vatican Council II with the False Premise.

The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) can no more be accepted. Since Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents read with a Rational Premise has a traditional conclusion.The Council is in harmony with the past Magisterium on the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc.

Fr. Gianfranco Ghirlanda is an author of books on Canon Law. He also needs to clarify for the Canonical Associations in Italy, the Roman Rota and the Jesuit Superior General, that he interprets Vatican Councuil II  only with the Rational Premise.

Vatican Council II interpreted with the Rational Premise has LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being hypothetical and not objective in 2021.This is something obvious.It is commom sense.Invisible cases in real life are not practical exceptions for EENS. If in a box of oranges there is an apple, the apple is an exception not only because it is different but because it is there in that box.

So the Syllabus of Errors with the exclusivist ecumenism  and ecclesiocentric inter-religious dialogue, or mission, has no exception among invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II. There is no break with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.There are no objective examples of salvation outside the Church, without faith and baptism in 1965-2021.

The norm for salvation is faith and baptism and if there is an exception  it can only be known to God. There is no extraordinary means of salvation known to us human beings. Since physically we cannot meet or see someone saved with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood or invincible ignorance  etc.

We cannot say that there were 20 cases of the baptism of desire last year and 10 cases of persons who were saved in invincible ignorance the previous year.

So with the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II( LG 8, LG 16 etc are invisible) and the Irrational Interpretation ( LG 8, LG 16 etc are visible) we have two interpretations of the Council and so the different pastoral approaches since the theology is new ( with exceptions) or old ( without exceptions) and the doctrine is new ( outside the Church there is salvation) or old (outside the Church there is no salvation).-Lionel Andrades