The CDF made a historical doctrinal and theological mistake in the LOHO when it confused what is physically invisible as being visible and then approved the New Theology based upon this objective error. Even non Christian scholars would agree – the CDF made an empirical error

 

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican (CDF) accompanied all the popes from Paul VI in interpreting Vatican Council II with an irrational and not rational premise and so the official conclusion was nontraditional instead of traditional.

Also the CDF Letter of the Holy Office 1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, wrongly assumed unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, are known exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 is referenced in Vatican Council II and placed in the Denzinger with this objective mistake. It was approved by Fr. Karl Rainer and Fr. Joseph Rat zinger.

The CDF made a historical doctrinal and theological mistake in the LOHO when it confused what is physically invisible as being visible and then approved the New Theology based upon this objective error. Even non Christian scholars would agree – the CDF made an empirical error.  -Lionel Andrades