Friday, April 8, 2022

Bettina Stark-Watzinger is the Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany : she could check the mistakes on Vatican Council II being taught at the schools, colleges and universities

 

FRIDAY, APRIL 8, 2022



APRIL 8, 2022

Latin Mass Society, Una Voce must confirm that they interpret Vatican Council II rationally and in harmony with Tradition.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/04/latin-mass-society-una-voce-must.html



MARCH 21, 2022

Bettina Stark-Watzinger is the Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany : she could check the mistakes on Vatican Council II being taught at the schools, colleges and universities

 

                                                                                                                                              -Lionel Andrades

MARCH 16, 2022

The German Ministry of Education must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask the German Bishops Conference to do the same.

                                                                                                                                                                                      -Lionel Andrades





MARCH 13, 2022

The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes : the German government and secular and Protestant organizations accept the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.

 

The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes.

Heresy and schism were mortal sins for the Catholic Church in Germany before the 1940ìs. Now with the False Premise, creating a new fake theology there is no doctrinal unity in the Catholic Church on the First Commandment. ‘I am the Lord your God, thou shalt have no other God but me’. There is also no more unity on the Nicene Creed and the Athanasius Creed.

For the German Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX were made obsolete with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise.

So the German Synodal Way does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus since there are alleged  exceptions in Vatican Council II, when it is interpreted irrationally by the German cardinals and bishops.

This is also the irrational interpretation of German Head of States, Chancellors and Government offices.

Now the German government and German secular and Protestant organizations accept the German Catholic cardinals and bishops’ fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.

-Lionel Andrades


MARCH 12, 2022


Is the German Synodal Way legal?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/is-german-synodal-way-legal_12.html






1 Athanasius Creed
















2.Nicene Creed








3.Apostles Creed







 MARCH 18, 2022

All the German theological journals are unaware of this.

 

In Germany the official media and public institutions of the government cannot continue to interpret Vatican Council II and other Church Documents with a Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion, which is heretical and schismatic.Presently all the German theological journals are unaware of this.                             -Lionel Andrades


 OCTOBER 18, 2021

230 German theologians use the same False Premise as Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Mattei and Ferrara

                                                                                                                                   -Lionel Andrades


 

OCTOBER 18, 2021

Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted the Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the Fake Premise and so did the SSPX bishops and priests. This is heresy. It is also schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries, which did not use the same Premise

 

Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted the Athanasius Creed, Nicene Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with the Fake Premise and so did the SSPX bishops and priests. This is heresy. It is also schism with the past Magisterium over the centuries, which used the Rational Premise to create the old theology.SSPX lay supporters  today are also in heresy and schism unless they avoid the False Premise. Heresy and schism are mortal sin of faith. Peter Kwasniewski, Joseph Shaw, Eric Sammons, Michael Matt, Matt Gaspers, Edward Pentin and John Henry Weston have no denial.Their interpretation of Magisterial Documents is heretical and schismatic. Catholics are following them.

John Henry Weston interviewed Eric Sammons and neither of the two of them affirm the teaching outside the Church there is no salvation. There are exceptions for them.This is heresy and schism. How can there be practical exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2021 for them ? This is Cushingism and not Feeneyism.

Chris Ferrara debated Mark Shea on the subject outside the Church there is no salvation and both used the False Premise. They are Cushingites in a break with the past Magisterium.

Roberto dei Mattei has written that outside the Church there is no salvation but with the False Premise.So he changes the interpretation of EENS but also the Catechisms, Vatican Council II, the Creeds etc- this is heresy and schism.

Maria Guarani’s blog Chiesa e Post Concilio has a home page full of reports and videos on Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise.This is all now obsolete.

How can those who support heresy and schism and

division call themselves  Catholics ?Traditionalists 

cannot also be liberals who use a Fake Premise.-Lionel Andrades


Lionel Andrades

Writer on Vatican Council II being dogmatic and not only pastoral.It is in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius Creed etc.

It is found that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other irrational. Since one uses a Rational Premise and the other a False Premise.One is Magisterial with the past Magisterium and the other, the common one, has an objective error  and so cannot be Magisterial.It is the same with the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.

Why should Catholics choose the irrational version which is heretical, non traditional, liberal and schismatic, while a rational option is there, which is traditional ?.

__________________



No comments: