In Chicago all the priests at Holy Mass
must affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX since Vatican Council II can
only be interpreted rationally. This is being honest. The laity must not allow
them to use a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then suggest
that the Syllabus of Errors is contradicted by the Council, interpreted
irrationally.
The Council should not be a rupture with
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or
the Athanasius Creed for any priest.
THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND BEING SAVED ARE ALWAYS HYPOTHETICAL ONLY IN 2022
The baptism of desire, baptism of blood
and invincible ignorance can only be interpreted rationally. So they are not explicit,
known people in the present times. They are not objective and practical
exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
UNITATIS REDINTIGRATIO REFERS TO ONLY HYPOTHETICAL AND SPECULATIVE CASES IN 2022
Unitatis Redintigratio can only be
interpreted as referring to hypothetical cases in 2022. So UR 3, for example,
does not contradict the ecumenism of return or the Syllabus of Errors.
LG 8 refers to hypothetical cases of non
Catholics saved with elements of sanctification and truth in other religions.
These are speculative and theoretical cases. So LG 8 does not contradict the Syllabus
of Errors’ teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation.
So all the priests in Chicago,
especially those who offer the Novus Ordo Mass in English must affirm the
Syllabus of Errors and Tradition and interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 6, 2022
The laity in Chicago must take back the Church
In Illinois, Chicago they have a group of laity seen in the video who must call upon the priests to give them a Vatican Council II which is rational. Then at Holy Mass in English and Latin the priests have to preach in support of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the past ecumenism of return to the Church, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions in 2022, the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q) and the need to have Jesus at the centre of all politics (Quas Primas). The laity in Chicago now has the ball in their court. They can bring unity in theology and doctrines, back to the Church. The priests can no more carry liberalism and theological division on their backs, by using the Fake Premise. The can no more interpret the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) irrationally and then say that there are known to them non Catholics, saved outside the Church, without the Catholic faith and the baptism of water. This is false since there are no such persons in 1965-2022.So BOD and I.I do not contradict the past strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, affirmed by three Church Councils, in the extra-ordinary Magisterium.
When the priests know this they have to change, since the laity will not more affirm EENS, with BOD and I.I interpreted with the False Premise. They will no more interpret Vatican Council II, with LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, interpreted with the Fake Premise. This ruse creates false exceptions for EENS and the rest of Tradition.
So Vatican Council II (Rational) at any Mass and Rite and language, would be coherent with the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the past Magisterium. There would not be a break with the theology of the Roman Missal (1580).
The laity must insist that a Catholic priest in Chicago no more support an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise. This should not be allowed.
In Chicago they have an organized group of laity who want the Latin Mass, which has been banned by Cardinal Cupich for the Easter Triduum.
The cardinal interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and fans the fake theological liberalism in the Church. So there is division. There are liberals created who oppose conservatives who follow Tradition. The Bible is re-interpreted. The result is public heresy and schism which are mortal sins of faith.
The laity should not allow the False Premise to be used by the cardinals, bishops and priests in Chicago.
APRIL 5, 2022
Chicago Catholics did not hold a Press Conference asking Cardinal Cupich to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the Roman Missal
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial. Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
MARCH 15, 2022
Catholics in Germany are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise when the rational option is there and it produces a traditional and non heretical conclusion.
In Germany they have an obligation to proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics, based upon the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II. The Council interpreted with the Rational Premise is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church of Pope John Paul II, all interpreted rationally.
There are no literal cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in the present times. These are always implicit and not explicit cases. This is something obvious. It is common sense.
But Cardinal Marx interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise and all who are employed in the Archdiocese of Munich have to do the same. This is discrimination based upon a falsehood.
All young people who wish to become priests or religious sisters have to use the False and not Rational Premise to be accepted. This is organized deception. It is official.
Similarly only those who apply for educational scholarships are approved who use a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II? This is not Catholic.
Now the German Synodal Way is based upon this irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, it is confirmed by Cardinal Marx.
If he interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then he would have to affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. It supports an ecumenism of return to the Church which the cardinal rejects.
He can no more cite Vatican Council II for his heresy and schism since now we know that the Council can be interpreted with the Rational Premise and the conclusion is traditional. Catholics in Germany are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise when the rational option is there and it produces a traditional and non heretical conclusion. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 14, 2022
The German government must not allow German cardinals and bishops to collect tax donations until they correct their error
MARCH 13, 2022
The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes : the German government and secular and Protestant organizations accept the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.
MARCH 12, 2022
Is the German Synodal Way legal?
MARCH 25, 2022
Young German Catholics need to produce a video showing the difference between the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion and the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and Traditional Conclusion.
The young German Catholics are probably going back to Tradition by rejecting Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise. They now need to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and ask Bishop George Batzing, Chairman of the German Catholics Bishops Conference.
In their next video they could explain the difference between the Fake Premise, False Inference and Non Traditional Conclusion and the Rational Premise, Rational Inference and Traditional Conclusion.
Then they could show how Cardinal Marx and Bishop Batzing continue to use the Fake Premise to create exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X and the rest of Tradition.
So there is no continuity with the past Tradition, the past Magisterium, which did not use the False Premise to interpret the Syllabus of Errors, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Then they could show the video to the media and the bishops in Germany.
They can then have all those books and theological journals on Vatican Council II (Irrational) thrown out. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 24, 2022
#InDefenseOfOurChurch: Ein Statement für die Tradition : this young group of German Catholic traditionalists could check the error of Bishop Georg Batzing and the German Minsitry of Education
MARCH 24, 2022
If the young group of German traditionalists can get past the hurdle among the Lefebvrists, they could check the objective error made by Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference
The German Education Ministry is teaching Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise instead of the Rational Premise. Those young Germans who produced that video could check it out.
So if the young group of German traditionalists can get past the hurdle among the Lefebvrists, they could check the objective error made by Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 22, 2022
The German Federal Ministry of Information and the Education Ministry must ask Bishop Georg Batzing to correct the error. The Vatican diplomat in Germany must do the same. Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria must correct the mistake. The Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany must interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.
Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference can take, the German Church back to the original teachings of the Church.
1. He must not use a Fake Premise to interpret Church Documents (Vatican Council II etc.
2. He must interpret Church Documents (Vatican Council II, Creeds, Catechisms etc) with a Rational Premise. This is Catholic and it is being honest.
I interpret Church Documents with the Rational Premise.So there are no practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius X, the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), for me.
Now Vatican Council II is being interpreted with a Fake Premise by the German Bishops Conference and the German Synodal Way.
The Fake Premise is used by the German government, Lutheran, ecumenical and inter-faith organizations.
Bishop Georg Batzing uses the Fake Premise (invisible people are visible) instead of the Rational Premise (invisible people are invisible in 2022). He then chooses the False Inference ( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church as referred to in LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are physically visible in 1965-2022). He does not choose the Rational Inference( invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and the baptism of water, are always invisible for us in these present times)
So with the Fake Premise the non-traditional conclusion is outside the Church there is known salvation and there are exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors etc. This is not the orthodox, and traditional conclusion of outside the Church there is no known salvation, LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only. So there are no practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors, the Creeds and Catechisms and the dogma EENS in the present times. There is no break with Tradition.
The German Federal Ministry of Information and the Education Ministry must ask Bishop Georg Batzing to correct the error. The Vatican diplomat in Germany must do the same. Pope Francis and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria must correct the mistake.
The Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany must interpret Vatican Council II only with the Rational Premise.This is being ethical and Catholic. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 21, 2022
Bishop Georg Batzing, Chairman of the German Bishops Conference can no more interpret Vatican Council II with the False Premise
MARCH 21, 2022
Bettina Stark-Watzinger is the Roman Catholic Federal Minister of Education in Germany : she could check the mistakes on Vatican Council II being taught at the schools, colleges and universities
MARCH 16, 2022
The German Ministry of Education must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask the German Bishops Conference to do the same.
MARCH 13, 2022
The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes : the German government and secular and Protestant organizations accept the fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.
The information the German Synodal Way gives out on Vatican Council II is not correct. They are presenting the Council with a lie in official heresy and schism which is approved by the present two popes.
Heresy and schism were mortal sins for the Catholic Church in Germany before the 1940ìs. Now with the False Premise, creating a new fake theology there is no doctrinal unity in the Catholic Church on the First Commandment. ‘I am the Lord your God, thou shalt have no other God but me’. There is also no more unity on the Nicene Creed and the Athanasius Creed.
For the German Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX were made obsolete with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with a False Premise.
So the German Synodal Way does not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus since there are alleged exceptions in Vatican Council II, when it is interpreted irrationally by the German cardinals and bishops.
This is also the irrational interpretation of German Head of States, Chancellors and Government offices.
Now the German government and German secular and Protestant organizations accept the German Catholic cardinals and bishops’ fake interpretation of Vatican Council II in the area of public spending, educational scholarships, general employment and inter-faith meetings.
-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 12, 2022
Is the German Synodal Way legal?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment