Cardinal Sean O’Mally
the archbishop of Boston was present at the crisis-meeting in Chicago(March 25-26,2022) on
Vatican Council II.He has discovered that the Council is traditional when interpreted with a Rational
Premise and supports extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston. Pope Francis knows it too. The
horses have left the stable.The Council is no more under liberal-control.
Conservative Catholics are smiling.They are waiting for an announcement from the
Vatican.
We have come back a full circle from the Boston Heresy Case.This was when the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing, was not accused of heresy and the blame was placed on an innocent priest. The Jesuit priest Fr. Leonard Feeney refused to say that there are visible cases of the baptism of desire etc.
ATHANASIUS SCHNEIDER AND TAYLOR MARSHALL SUPPORT LEONARD FEENEY
Recently, Bishop
Athanasius Schneider supported the Boston priest, when interviewed by Dr. Taylor Marshall. Schneider said
that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. Taylor confirmed
that there are no explicit cases of Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.This was a theological explosion for the liberals.They could not find a solution last month.
LIBERALS HAVE TO SAY THAT LG 8,14 & 16 REFER TO HYPOTHETICAL CASES ONLY.
The liberals now have to say that LG
8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to implicit
and hypothetical cases only.So LG 8, GS 22 etc are no more practical exceptions for the
Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. It means the Catholic Church is back to an
ecumenism of return and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the
missionaries in the 16th century.
FAGGIOLI'S NCR REPORT EXPRESSES DEFEAT
The past has caught
up with Massimo Faggioli who addressed the 70 cardinals,bishops and lay theologians in Chicago.Faggioli, as expected, had no answer. There was no way out.His defeat shows in a
lengthy article he has written for the National Catholic Reporter.He does not even mention the specific problem.Since there is
only one rational alternative before him and Pope Francis would call it ‘rigid’.It means Faggioli's formation with Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) with the common false premise is obsolete. It has been exposed on the Internet.
Cardinal Cupich too is now forced to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and return to the old theology of
the Roman Missal.This is the Missal banned in Rome by the Vicariate for the Easter Triduum.
CATHOLCS IN THE PEWS ARE SEEING THE OBVIOUS
But the liberalism of
Vatican Council II at the Novus Ordo Mass has also taken a hit. Catholics
in the pews will learn that the Council supports Tradition in a radical turn around.
Bishops and parish priests could affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King in all politics, based up Feeneyite EENS.There will be a political fall out.So the Chicago meeting was called.
VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL) BRINGS UNITY INTO THE CHURCH
Cardinal Mardiaga, present at the meeting, will
now have to affirm Tradition like the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). Cardinal Semeraro at Albano, Italy will now
theologically be in line with the SSPX.Since Vatican Council II ( Rational) brings unity into the Catholic Church just as Vatican Council II ( Irrational) brought heresy and schism.The ecclesiology of Holy Mass in Latin and
Italian at Albano, will now be exclusivist.
This is good news for the persecuted St. Benedict Center in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA. Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports them. The liberal theologians at Chicago can see the obvious. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are hypothetical 24-hours, in season and out.The Athanasius Creed is no more contradicted and so Cardinal Sean O Malley must return to the extra ecclesiam nulla salus of Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center of Boston.
Boston College expelled
Fr. Leonard Feeney and other Catholic professors, when they did not project unknown
cases of the baptism of desire and beings saved in invincible ignorance, as being known exceptions for EENS. The Jesuits, like Boston
College, expelled the Jesuit priest, and then interpreted EENS with the False Premise.Cardinal Sean O Malley must apologise.
RAHNER AND RATZINGER BROUGHT DIVISION INTO THE CHURCH
With the False Premise Rahner and Ratzinger brought liberalism and division in theology.We now have unity before us. We can also undo
the bad work of Pope Paul VI after 1965.
We now have coherence with the Magisterium of the Patristic period and the Jesuit missionaries of the Middle Ages. The Catholic Church has returned to the past. Chicago did not have a solution.
'Rome has come back to the faith'.
-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 4, 2022
Vatican Council II has become a crisis for the liberals : 70 cardinals, bishops and liberal theologians met privately in Chicago last month
APRIL 4, 2022
Liberals on the defensive in Chicago : Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a rational premise and the conclusion is traditional
APRIL 4, 2022
Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters cannot accept reality. Vatican Council II ( Irrational) is finished . It’s obsolete. We have a rational alternative and we Catholics are not obliged to follow their irrational and deceptive interpretation of the Council.
APRIL 3, 2022
Bishop Robert Barron and John Allen Jr., were cheating with their book which was sold at the Los Angeles Religious Conference and was based upon Vatican Council II interpreted with the Fake Premise
Bishop Robert Barron and John Allen Jr., were cheating with their book which was sold at the Los Angeles Religious Conference.In their New Evangelisation they interpret Vatican Council II, knowingly with the False Premise to create a rupture with Catholic Tradition, which was exclusivist on salvation.
Bishop Barron and John Allen were proclaiming Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Church, without the reference to Hell and without the reference to mortal sins of faith.
In the past they could put aside the original teachings of the Church Fathers on salvation by saying that Vatican Council II ( Irrational), interpreted with the False Premise, contradicts extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). But now we know that we can interpret Vatican Council II (rationally) with the Rational Premise and there are no exceptions mentioned in the text for the strict interpretation of EENS, which would be rejected by Catholics in ignorance, at the L.A Conference.
So Barron and Allen have produced a politically -correct -with -the -Left book which denies the Athanasius Creed and considers it Catholic.
They both know that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, their’s and mine, and the conclusion is different.They are intentionally choosing the Fake Premise to produce a break with Tradition and which would contribute towards the New Ecumenism in a New World Order.
Without the Fake Premise there would not be the New Theology, New Evangelisation and New Ecumenism.
Scott Hahn praised this book because he too interprets Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise to produce a rupture with the dogma EENS which was affirmed by the Vendees, St. John of Arc and the Cristoforos in Mexico, whom he refers to at times.
Similarly Ralph Martin’s books are also written with the Fake and not Rational Premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. So he does not have to affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.
So he was invited at the Synod for the New Evangelisation.His books are approved by writers on Vatican Council II who also use the Fake Premise and then suggest that non Catholics do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation.This is their New Evangelisation.
Bishop Barron could not tell Ben Shapiro that he needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. This is the New Evangelisation.They interpret Lumen Gentium with the Fake Premise and then project non existing exceptions for John 3:5 and Mark 16:16.
This is what Barron and Allen are doing in their books.
They are proclaiming Jesus in a vague way without mentioning that outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation in the present times.There are no practical exceptions for Magisterial Documents which they re-interpret with the False Premise.
There were people at the L.A Conference who were catechizing at the parish level, who do not know that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell, with no known exceptions, unless they convert into the Catholic Church and that this is the traditional teaching of Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally.
With the Fake Premise they are influenced by the culture which rejects the Church Fathers, the missionaries of the 16th century and the traditional Catholic ecclesiology which is exclusivist, after Vatican Council II (rational).
-Lionel Andrades
APRIL 3, 2022
The USCCB needs to clarify that LG 16 (I.I) and LG 14 (BOD) refer to only hypothetical cases in 2022 : otherwise it is promoting a lie
The American bishops (USCCB) are cheating. The Catholic Church has always taught that there is exclusive salvation in only Jesus in His Mystical Body the Catholic Church. The USCCB bishops say ‘No’. There are exceptions for them. Example, people who are in ignorance and do not know the Gospel for no fault of their own(LG 14) or who have a desire to receive the baptism of water but die before receiving it. They too will be saved for the USCCB bishops. So not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation is their false reasoning.
It is false since being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) or with the desire for the baptism of water, commonly called the baptism of desire (BOD) are not objective cases in the present times. We cannot see someone saved with BOD or I.I. It is known only to God. So it is false to project BOD and I.I as being practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. So it is false for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) to suggest that there are known cases of BOD and I.I in 2021-2022.How can invisible cases of BOD and I.I be practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (outside the Church there is no salvation) in the present times? How can BOD and I.I contradict the Athanasius Creed?
Yes, the American bishops will not affirm the Athanasius Creed in public.
They use a Fake Premise (invisible people are visible in the present times). Then they follow it with a False Inference (there are invisible cases of non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water).
Then there is the False Conclusion (everyone does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. The Athanasius Creed, dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors are obsolete with the exceptions).
So in the past the popes taught that outside the Church there is no salvation, now the Americanists say outside the Church there is salvation. This is specious reasoning.
RATIONAL PREMISE FOR ME
I still continue to use the Rational Premise ( invisible people are invisible ) and Lumen Gentium 14( BOD) and Lumen Gentium 16( I.I) in Vatican Council II refer to only speculative, hypothetical and theoretical cases in 2022.
So there are no exceptions for EENS etc, mentioned in Vatican Council II, for me. The Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors are not contradicted by Vatican Council II. No exceptions are mentioned in the text of Vatican Council II.
VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL) SUPPORTS EENS
Instead, Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 say all need faith and the baptism of water for salvation. The word all is used in Ad Gentes 7.
So the Catholic Church, for me, still affirms that it has exclusive salvation. My premise and inference are rational and so my conclusion is traditional. I consider this being Catholic and this is being honest.
The Catholic Church has not changed its teaching on John 3:5 and Mark 16:16. There is the Great Commission- with no known exceptions in practical life.This is a practical reality. Non Catholics need to convert to avoid Hell ( for salvation) is still the hard truth taught by the Catholic Church in Vatican Council II(rational) and other Magisterial Documents interpreted rationally. So the American bishops are cheating.
They lie for political reasons. How can they be trusted on other issues? They need to correct the error.
They are unethical even by secular standards in the USA.
Bishop Robert Barron when asked by Ben Shapiro, an orthodox Jew, if he needed to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (for salvation)- Bishop Barron said No. Barron then rationalized.He indicated that Lumen Gentium 16 (invincible ignorance) was a practical exception for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, which he denied before Shapiro.
Ben Shapiro was not in invincible ignorance and neither did he have the desire for the baptism of water.
But Bishop Barron was saying that the non Christian did not need to convert and that there was no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. For salvation it was not necessary to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for Bishop Barron.
He projected invisible cases as being visible exceptions for Catholic Tradition.
Imagine it- when you meet the average American bishop, you know his concept of reality is different from yours. For him invisible people are visible and for me invisible people are invisible. So his concepts in medicine, health, pharmacology, medical treatment and rehabilitation, COVID etc, could also be different.
Their opinion on child safety could also be different, since their objective reality, is different from mine – what is invisible in the present life is visible for the USCCB.
Practically we are living in different realities. Their boarding of airplanes could be different and in emergency situations could also be differet.
Is it honest and legal, for them to teach Catholics, and inform people at large, that physically invisible people are visible? We can see and meet a baptism of desire case in New York or California?
Can they be trusted with finances?
It may not be a mortal sin, for them, since their objective reality on earth, is different.
The USCCB needs to clarify that LG 16 (I.I) and LG 14 (BOD) refer to only hypothetical cases in 2022. -Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment