The Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Catholic Church since there can be two interpretations.
The Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Church since there can be two interpretations. The line marked in red is now controversial.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints..- Apostles Creed
The confusion came into the Church during the Fr. Leonard Feeney case when unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) were considered objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the New Theology said there is salvation outside the Church; known salvation, while the past Magisterium would state over the centuries that outside the Church there is no salvation.
So for me,the the Holy Spirit teaches the Catholic Church today ( Ad Gentes 7, Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 etc) that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation.All must accept Jesus and his teachings in the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and go to Heaven(AG 7).
While for other Catholics the new teaching is that the Holy Spirit teaches the Church today that outside the Church there is salvation and all do not need to be members of the Church ,to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.
For me being in communion with the saints means affirming the past interpretation of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance which was rational. It did not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS.
Those who recite the Apostles Creed in the Church today are in a rupture theologically and doctrinally with the Apostles, the Church Fathers, the saints of the Middle Ages and the saints before the 1940s like St. Maximillian Kolbe who held the strict interpretation of EENS and affirmed the Athanasius Creed too.
Most Catholics are in a break with the saints, since today they interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in in invincible ignorance(I.I) ,as practical exceptions for EENS. Catholics have to choose to believe in visible cases BOD and I.I or EENS. So they contradict the past saints.
I can accept both-BOD and I.I and EENS- and I do not have to choose. The BOD and I.I are invisible cases for me in 2022 but the rest of the Church implies that they are visible. So they become practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS for them.They were mislead by the 1949 CDF Letter and the false narrative of the CDF at Vatican Council II and later.
For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) made an objective mistake which was overlooked at Vatican Council II. The present two popes and many traditionalists, accept the LOHO with the mistake and do not correct it.-
OFFICIAL HERESY AND SCHISM
The two popes obstinately doubt or deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They use the False Premise.
They also deny the centuries old interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed by re-interpreting BOD, BOB and I.I.
They also deny the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation.For them outside the Church there is personally known salvation so there are exceptions to the Athanasius Creed.
They re-interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with these Creeds even though a rational interpretation of the Council in harmony with the Creeds is possible.They do not proclaim this rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The overall result is new doctrines with the Catechisms contradicting each other.
THE ITC MADE A MISTAKE HERE
1The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood. On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord”- 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized'.(Note: It is assumed here that those saved in invincible ignorance are are explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
67. Vatican Council II makes its own the expression extra ecclesiam nulla salus. But in using it the council explicitly directs itself to Catholics and limits its validity to those who know the necessity of the Church for salvation. The council holds that the affirmation is based on the necessity of faith and of baptism affirmed by Christ (LG 14). In this way the council aligned itself in continuity with the teaching of Pius XII, but emphasized more clearly the original parenthentical character of this expression.- Christianity and the World Religions 1997.
3.SEPTEMBER 11, 2015
OATH AGAINST MODERNISM : MAGISTERIUM IS IN HERESYhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/09/oath-against-modernism-magisterium-is.html
Oath of fidelity made by all Bishops officially supports irrationality, heresy and non traditional conclusionshttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/oath-of-fidelity-made-by-all-bishops.html
Meaningless Profession of Faith was made yesterday in Church for Easterhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/meaningless-profession-of-faith-was.html
JULY 4, 2018
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment