The web blog Rorate Caeili and Fr.Pietro Leone are choosing the politically correct version of Vatican Council II and so there is no opposition for them, from the Left. If they interpreted the Council with the Rational Premise, Inference and Conclusion they would have to really affirm Tradition ( the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors with no known exceptions and the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions in 2022). They would be Feeneyite.
So they continue with the interpretation of the Council according to the liberals, the Left and the popes since Paul VI to Francis.
I have pointed it out to them before, that Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Decree on Ecumenism in Vatican Council II, refers to a hypothetical case always. We cannot meet or see someone saved outside the Church in, for example, imperfect communion with the Church. So UR 3 does not contradict the past ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church for me, as it does for them.
I am interpreting UR 3 with the Rational Premise, Inference and Conclusion. They choose the common and politically correct, Irrational Premise, Inference and Conclusion.
In the same way subsists it in Lumen Gentium 8 refers to a speculative case always. So it is not an example of known salvation outside the Church, in the present times, in this way.Leone makes a mistake here too.
We cannot meet or see someone saved with elements of sanctification and truth in other religions (LG 8)or by that ray of truth (NA 2) etc.
We can accept Vatican Council II without the political interpretation of Rorate Caeili.-Lionel Andrades
- Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment