If Brother Andre Marie micm is invited to Rome as a Consultant he could show how there could not be a legal agreement between the Diocese of Porto Santa Rufina, Rome and the Comitato dell Immaculata, Rome, since both or one legal party, does not affirm the Creeds according to Catholic Tradition over the centuries. It is not Catholic to change the Creeds.
Catholic integrity demands that they
choose only a Rational Premise and Inference, to interpret the Nicene, Apostles
and Athanasius Creeds.
__________________contd.
The diocese also unethically interprets
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. So there is an
artificial break with Tradition which would not be there if the premise was
rational.
So this would make the agreement of the
Comitato dell Immaculata and the Diocese of Porto Santa Rufina null and void.
Since objectively Bishop Gino Reali is not affirming the Creeds as a Catholic.
He is also not choosing to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of
Pope John Paul II, rationally. He does not represent the Catholic Church.
Bishops Gino Reali and Bishop Gian Rico ruzza do not deny what is written here.
He did not state over the last few years that he will interpret the Creeds
rationally. Neither does he state now that he will interpret Vatican Council II,
rationally, in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. He does not
state that for him the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible
ignorance (LG 16) always refers to only hypothetical and theoretical cases.
So under these conditions how can Bishop Gino Reali make legal agreements representing the Catholic Church?.Brother Andre Marie micm has an academic degree in Theology has also learnt Philosophy under Brother Francis Maluf micm.He could point out precisely where the False Premise is used by the diocese bishops. -Lionel Andrades
_______________________________________________
DECEMBER 22, 2022
How can they legally represent the Catholic Church? How can they be called Catholic?
DECEMBER 17, 2022
The basic issue which I keep writing about here is philosophical and not theological.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/12/the-basic-issue-which-i-keep-writing.html
The Nicene Creed was changed with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 mistake : it was approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger
MARCH 9, 2021
The Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Catholic Church since there can be two interpretations.
Someone placed copies of the Apostles Creed on the table at the entrance of the church where I went for Holy Mass today in Italian.
The Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Church since there can be two interpretations. The line marked in red is now controversial.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints..- Apostles Creed
The confusion came into the Church during the Fr. Leonard Feeney case when unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) were considered objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the New Theology said there is salvation outside the Church; known salvation, while the past Magisterium would state over the centuries that outside the Church there is no salvation.
So for me,the the Holy Spirit teaches the Catholic Church today ( Ad Gentes 7, Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 etc) that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and all must accept Jesus and his teachings in the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.
While for other Catholics in church the new teaching is that the Holy Spirit teaches the Church today that outside the Church there is salvation and all do not need to be members of the Church ,to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.
For me being in communion with the saints means affirming the past interpretation of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance which was rational. It did not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS.
Those who recite the Apostles Creed in the Church today are in a rupture theologically and doctrinally with the Apostles, the Church Fathers, the saints of the Middle Ages and the saints before the 1940s like St. Maximillian Kolbe who held the strict interpretation of EENS and affirmed the Athanasius Creed too.
Most Catholics are in a break with the saints, since today they interpret BOD and I.I as practical exceptions to EENS. Catholics have to choose to believe in BOD and I.I or EENS. So they contradict the past saints.
I can accept both-BOD and I.I and EENS- and I do not have to choose. The BOD and I.I are invisible cases for me in 2021 but the rest of the Church implies that they are visible. So they become practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for them.
For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) made an objective mistake which was overlooked at Vatican Council II. The present two popes and many traditionalists, accept the LOHO with the mistake and do not correct it.
The Nicene Creed affirms the necessity of the baptism of water for the forgiveness of sins and the Athanasius Creed says outside the Church there is no salvation.-Lionel Andrades
https://lifeteen.com/blog/why-do-catholics-pray-the-creed/
__________________________
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Cardinal Ratzinger is a Cushingite and has interpreted the Nicene Creed with a false premise and inference which was not the understanding of the past centuries.Ignatius Press has published Credo for Today addressed to Christians and not Catholics. The Nicene Creed can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion would be different.
- Nicene Creed (10)
- Nicene Creed was changed with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 mistake (6)
- Nicene Creed-two interpretations (1)
MARCH 10, 2021
My interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed is different from yours
My interpretation of the Nicene and Apostles Creed is different from yours. - Lionel Andrades
MARCH 9, 2021
The Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Catholic Church since there can be two interpretations.
Someone placed copies of the Apostles Creed on the table at the entrance of the church where I went for Holy Mass today in Italian.
The Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Church since there can be two interpretations. The line marked in red is now controversial.
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints..- Apostles Creed
The confusion came into the Church during the Fr. Leonard Feeney case when unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) were considered objective exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the New Theology said there is salvation outside the Church; known salvation, while the past Magisterium would state over the centuries that outside the Church there is no salvation.
So for me,the the Holy Spirit teaches the Catholic Church today ( Ad Gentes 7, Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 etc) that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and all must accept Jesus and his teachings in the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and go to Heaven.
While for other Catholics in church the new teaching is that the Holy Spirit teaches the Church today that outside the Church there is salvation and all do not need to be members of the Church ,to go to Heaven and avoid Hell.
For me being in communion with the saints means affirming the past interpretation of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance which was rational. It did not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS.
Those who recite the Apostles Creed in the Church today are in a rupture theologically and doctrinally with the Apostles, the Church Fathers, the saints of the Middle Ages and the saints before the 1940s like St. Maximillian Kolbe who held the strict interpretation of EENS and affirmed the Athanasius Creed too.
Most Catholics are in a break with the saints, since today they interpret BOD and I.I as practical exceptions to EENS. Catholics have to choose to believe in BOD and I.I or EENS. So they contradict the past saints.
I can accept both-BOD and I.I and EENS- and I do not have to choose. The BOD and I.I are invisible cases for me in 2021 but the rest of the Church implies that they are visible. So they become practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for them.
For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) made an objective mistake which was overlooked at Vatican Council II. The present two popes and many traditionalists, accept the LOHO with the mistake and do not correct it.
The Nicene Creed affirms the necessity of the baptism of water for the forgiveness of sins and the Athanasius Creed says outside the Church there is no salvation.-Lionel Andrades
https://lifeteen.com/blog/why-do-catholics-pray-the-creed/
__________________________
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Cardinal Ratzinger is a Cushingite and has interpreted the Nicene Creed with a false premise and inference which was not the understanding of the past centuries.Ignatius Press has published Credo for Today addressed to Christians and not Catholics. The Nicene Creed can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion would be different.
- Nicene Creed (10)
- Nicene Creed was changed with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 mistake (6)
- Nicene Creed-two interpretations (1)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment