According to Canon Law, Cardinal Marx and Bishop Georg Batzing have to be Catholic. They must affirm Catholic teachings in public. However we know that they both reject the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. They do this in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. It is the same with Massimo Faggioli and Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) in Italy.

 

According to Canon Law, Cardinal Marx and Bishop Georg Batzing have to be Catholic. They must affirm Catholic teachings in public. However we know that they both reject the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. They do this in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. It is the same with Massimo Faggioli and Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) in Italy.

We now know that Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatis  Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium Specs 22, can be interpreted rationally or irrationally. There are two different conclusions. If interpreted rationally they do not contradict the ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors. The German bishops choose to be irrational. So LG 8 etc contradicts the traditional ecumenism based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

 Marx and Batzing need the false break with Tradition. They interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.

The traditional conclusion of Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is accepted by the SSPX. They are traditionalists. This cannot be accepted by the liberal German Synod Way. The liberals know that their liberalism comes only with the Council interpreted irrationally. They have to pretend that invisible cases of LG 8 etc are visible. They suggest that these are known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.

How can someone saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) or in invincible ignorance (LG 16) for example, be known to us human beings? They would be in Heaven. How can they be visible on earth and in Heaven at the same time?

Those Catholics who do not affirm the Creeds in their original interpretation are automatically excommunicated as heretics. This is the official teaching of the Church according to Canon Law. It is not just my personal opinion.

                                 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/creeds-change-with-interpretation-of.html

The Creeds are not interpreted rationally by the German bishops. There is no denial from them.

Heresy is a mortal sin. There is no denial from the German bishops. Since they want to support the Left and not affirm the dogma EENS. They need to interpret the Creeds and Catechisms irrationally to break with Tradition.

 Canonically they are not Catholic and cannot hold their office. It is the same for a Rector, Parish Priest or Religious Superior in Germany. It is the same for Pope Francis and all the Cardinals and Bishops.

There is the need for the SSPX to set up a Canonical Office or Department to handle these problems.  There are so many of them. For example, there is Bishop Charles More rod op, in Switzerland. He interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. So he will not affirm the Catechism of the Council of Trent and Pius X. There is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church for him. He has no right to be a bishop. We know that Vatican Council II (rational) does not contradict the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X. There is no break with the Syllabus of Errors.

Bishop Morerod and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Ladaria were officials of the International Theological Commission. They coordinated with Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. They produced theological papers while interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally.

Ladaria also headed the Vatican theologians in the doctrinal talks with the SSPX. This was during the pontificate of Pope Benedict. This issue of Vatican Council II being able to be interpreted only rationally and so ethically was not brought up at these talks.

They could not be discussed. Pope Benedict did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally. If he interpreted the Council rationally he would be affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).He would be endorsing EENS according to the missionaries of the 16^th century.

This was an important canonical issue. The SSPX did not correct the error.- Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 20, 2022

Creeds do not unite :official heresy and schism

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/creeds-do-not-unite.html

OCTOBER 20, 2022

Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Catholic Church. There are two interpretations of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/10/creeds-are-no-more-sign-of-unity-in.html

 

FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA NON C’E SALVEZZA

(OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION)

GIOV.3:5, MC.16:16

(JOHN 3:5, MARK 16:16)

CONCILIO VATICANO II (AG7/LG14)

(VATICAN COUNCIL II (AG7/LG14)

CATECHISMO DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA (846)

(CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 846)

CATECHISMO DEL TRENTO, CATECHISMO DEL PAPA PIO X,

(CATECHISM OF TRENT, CATECHISM OF POPE PIUS X)

CONCILIO LATERANO (1215), CONCILIO DI FIRENZE (1442)

FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL (1215), COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (1442).

Name. Lionel Andrades

https://twitter.com/AndradesLionel

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Blog: eucharistandmission ( Lionel’s blog)

Tel:-