The TV 2000 and RAI TV producers in Italy interpret Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gausium et Specs 22 etc irrationally. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. For them it refers to visible and known people.Only in this way can they reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Invisible people cannot be practical exceptions for EENS.So what is invisible has to be projected as being visible.
But they do not want to affirm EENS. They want a break with Tradition. So they confuse what is invisible ( LG 8 etc) as being visible. Then they conclude that EENS etc is obsolete.
The same error is made by Italian cardinals and bishops on TV . They infer that there are known non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times. So the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors are obsolete. They conclude that Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition.
Cardinal Semeraro in Albano, Italy does not affirm the dogma EENS since he interprets LG 8,14, 16 etc as referring to explicit cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times. I don’t make this mistake.
Pope Francis was interviewed on the Creed by TV 2000.He interprets the Nicene Creed with the False Premise and it does not show when he recites the Creed.
Fr. Sergio Palumba, the Rector at the parish church San Camillio de Lellis, via Salustiana, Rome was interviewed by TV 2000. This Camilian priest like the rest of the community interprets LG 8 etc irrationally. So there is a rupture with EENS as it was affirmed by St. Camillio de Lellis.
I affirm EENS like St. Camillio de Lellis and I interpret LG 8 etc as being only hypothetical cases. They obviously refer to physically invisible people in the present times. This is common knowledge.
There is a major error on Vatican Council II made by the television stations and no one corrects them. They interpret the Creeds, Catechisms, Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) wrongly.They made a mistake on the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), which were interpreted with the False Premise. They accepted the objective error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office(LOHO).
LOHO projected invisible cases of BOD and I.I as being objective exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. LOHO was placed in the Denzinger with this error and referenced in Vatican Council II.
Since 1949 the main line Church has been in schism and heresy. It will take them some time to get back to normal after the error is made public.
Since the time Pope Francis joined the Jesuits, he has been interpreting the 1949 LOHO and Vatican Council II irrationally.
A former District Superior of the SSPX at Albano, who is now in England, appeared on a TV program. He also interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally.- Lionel Andrades
JUNE 25, 2020
TV 2000 staff in Italy interpret the Creeds with a false premise
The TV 2000 staff in Italy interpret the Creed with a false premise and they have no comment on this issue.In a controversial interview of Pope Francis, the interviewet does not mention that the Creeds and Vatican Council II can be interpreted with or without a false premise and TV 2000 has chosen the irrational option like Pope Francis.
Even the different groups of the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St.Pius X make the same mistake.
The same problem exists in Italy and TV 2000 could do a program on this issue.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 23, 2020
Pope Francis and my interpretation of the Creeds is different.Priests do not say that I am wrong.
JUNE 24, 2020
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment