Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?

 

Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial? Even the pope is not magisterial. He does not affirm the dogma EENS and neither do Voris and Lofton. This is schism with the past Magisterium in the 12 th to 16 th centuries.

The SSPX follows the 1962 Missal whose ecclesiology is in harmony with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. The new Missal is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. How can this be inspired by the Holy Spirit? An irrational interpretation of the Council is Magisterial? Voris and Lofton attend the Novus Ordo Mass with the New Missal, reject the past Councils and interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. I don’t.

I attend the Novus Ordo Mass, affirm the old Councils, interpret Vatican Council II rationally and in harmony with the 1962 Missal. So when I attend the Latin or Novus Ordo Mass in Rome I am not in schism with the Magisterium of the 12^th to 16^th century. Voris and Lofton cannot say the same.

Why should the SSPX accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally? Why must they follow Pope Francis and Michael Voris? It is Cardinal Arthur Roche who must accept Vatican Council II interpreted rationally. There cannot be a new Magisterium with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally, with the common Fake Premise.

So those Catholics who want to follow the Holy Spirit at Mass in Latin or the vernacular, where can they go? I attend the Novus Ordo Mass in church. But they cannot go for the Latin Mass in the churches. It is prohibited by Pope Francis who does not affirm the past Councils, interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so is not Magisterial on many subjects of faith and morals. Must the SSPX be obedient to all this ?

Catholics need to find a priest who will offer the Latin Mass with the past ecclesiology in a private home, school, office etc.The priest can affirm the Council, interpreted rationally, and also Tradition. There is  no conflict. 
Pope Francis, Michael Voris and Michael Lofton reject Tradition. They have not denied it when I have interacted with them on Twitter.

The pope is expected to be Magisterial. The pope is not magisterial when he publically interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and rejects the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence on extra ecclesiam nulla salus. These Councils are not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.

He rejects the Athanasius Creed by interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally.

This changes the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed. This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths (Ad Tuenduem Fidem).This is an impediment to offering Holy Mass in any Rite. The pope is automatically excommunicated. He ceases to be pope until he ends the scandal receives absolution in the Confessional. Now he supports mortal sins of faith.

A pope cannot follow Satan and the Left. Otherwise it is political and not Catholic.

When Pope Francis chooses to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, then there is no new Magisterium. He becomes a traditionalist and the whole Church returns to Tradition. It was Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre who wanted Rome to come back to the Faith. Pope Francis has simply to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, rationally – and Rome comes back to the Catholic Faith. One simple action is needed. Vatican Council II will have a continuity with the past. - Lionel Andrades

https://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/mvsx-speeding-towards-schism