From the secular point of view, it is unethical for the Federal Ministry of Education in Germany to allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted irrationally and then taught to students.

 From the secular point of view, it is unethical for the Federal Ministry  of Education in Germany to allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted irrationally and then taught to students.They should also not grant scholarships to those who interpret Magisterial Documents irrationally to create a New Theology, with new doctrines which are not Catholic. Catholics are not obligated to be dishonest. The Federal Government must not be unethical.Students must be informed that the university officially chooses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council  and other Magisterial Documents and it is obligatory for all enrolling students to do the same.

The German Catholic Synod  can no more cite Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally to justify their innovation in faith and morals.Even cardinals Kasper, Muller and Brandmuller must interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

Pope Francis must correct this mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II etc.

It is more important than environmental issues since it is related to sin, Heaven and Hell.Jesus tells us in the Bible that Hell is a place. It is has fire and suffering. It is eternal. The pain does not stop.

I mentioned on this blog yesterday that the Faculty of Theolog at the University of Munich, Germany, the professors, Catholic and Protestant, are all interpreting Vatican Council II with a Fake Premise and Inference and so their conclusion is nontraditional, heretical and schismatic. They are unethical. So this is a legal issue in Germany. Students must be informed that the university offers classes with a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents and it is obligatory for all enrolled students to do the same. Also only those students will be given an academic degree or allowed to complete the final matriculation exam, who interpret the Council with the common Fake Premise to produce a liberal result.

Cardinal Reinhold Marx, Bishop Georg Batzinger and the rest of the German Bishops Conference are also dishonest and are doing the same. In public there is no denial from them.

They have a rational option. When Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 14, Lumen Gentium 16, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2,Gaudium et Specs 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only then LG 8 etc do not contradict the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church in Germany. So the teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation still stands and professors would have to teach it today.

Michael Seewald could no more produce books which say doctrine and dogma evolve in the Catholic Church. With the Rational Premise, Inference and Traditional Conclusion he has to return to the past ecclesiology on salvation, faith and morals. The liturgy can only be based on the 1962 Missal. Since Vatican Council II is traditionalist when interpreted rationally. This is the  only option we have. It is the ethical interpretation of the Council.

Seewald read the Council superficially, with the False Premise and then concluded that dogmas and doctrine change.

The University of Munich's interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) is based upon the error of Pope Pius XII made in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. This was the Boston Heresy case in which Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, Boston College and the American Jesuits were guilty. The error spread through the whole Church.Now it is being repeated by Catholics and Protestants at the University of Munich.

The professors could write books without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII. They would interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc rationally. Then their concept of religion and politics changes.- Lionel Andrades