Post a Comment On: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
Dear Mary Ann Kreitzer,
Praised be Jesus.
When Bishop Schneider was interviewed by Dr. Taylor Marshall he said
that there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire. Marshall confirmed
it. He said that there were no explicit cases of St. Thomas Aquinas'
implicit baptism of desire.
This is reality. We cannot meet any one saved with the baptism of
desire.
Could you let us know what do you think ? Is Lumen Gentium 14 ( baptism
of desire) referring to only a hypothetical and theoretical case for you?
In our 'exchanges' before you did not answer this question.
Then could you ask someone at the SSPX Headquarters to let us know what
is their official position on this issue ? The priests here in Rome have
conflicting or no views. They are afraid. Since this is a political subject.
The SSPX interpretation of Vatican Council II is political. You know it.
The SSPX is following the Vatican and the Left on Vatican Council II.The
Council is not a rupture with Tradition.
Is it possible for you to send this comment to someone responsible in
the SSPX. Plese ask him simply : Does LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc
in Vatican Council II refer to a subjective or objective case, someone
invisible or visible in 1965-2023, someone unseen or seen, someone unknown or
known.
John Martignoni the apologist says they refer to invisible cases.
Fr. Stefano Visintin osb the former Rector and Dean of Theology at the
University of St.Anselm says the same.
Archbishop Thomas Gullickson in a reply to my question, has also
answered in the affirmative on his blog.
In Christ
Lionel
Andrades
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8568419039847692717&postID=5695333203705705855&page=1&token=1680601484833
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment