Is the SSPX deliberately interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational and not rational premise to please the ADL ?

 

We must remember that the SSPX expelled Bishop Richard Williamson and Fr. Abrahamovich. The reason was not Catholic morality but the Holocaust figure. Could Father Federico Montani in Rome, Bishop Bernard Fellay and Fr. David Pagliarani at the SSPX Headquarters be intentionally, interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and unethically, to please the ADL and the rest of the Jewish Left ? Is the SSPX deliberately interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational and not rational premise to please the ADL ?

Fr. Federico Montani is 1.not affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Fourth Lateran Council 1215, Pope Honorius III etc) and neither is he asking the faithful at the SSPX Mass to do the so. He is also 2. not interpreting LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being only invisible cases in 1965-2023 and neither is he asking the faithful to do the same i.e.1. interpret Vatican Council II with LG 8 etc referring to invisible cases and 2.accept the Fourth Lateran Council which affirmed EENS with no exceptions.

This is at the heart of the problem.

The SSPX political, but unethical position on Vatican Council II is a scandal. It is public. The priest here must officially end it or the SSPX Headquarters must issue a statement on this subject.- Lionel Andrades