Will there be a schism from the Left ? The USA and Britain will rebel ?

 

IF POPE FRANCIS SAYS LG 8,14, 16,UR3 ETC REFER TO INVISIBLE CASES ALWAYS - WILL THE GERMAN CARDINALS AND BISHOPS ACCEPT THIS ?

If tomorrow Pope Francis and the cardinals announce that Vatican Council II is to be only interpreted rationally i.e.  Lumen Gentium 8, 14, 16 etc, refer to only hypothetical cases, what will be the state of the Catholic Church? Will the German, American and English bishops still support the Holy See?

WHAT IF A GROUP OF CARDINALS SAY LG8,14 AND 16 REFER TO INVISIBLE CASES IN 2023, WILL POPE FRANCIS AND THE CDF ACCEPT IT ? 

If a group of cardinals announce that they will only interpret Vatican Council II, with UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, referring to physically invisible people. What will be the reaction of Pope Francis? How will the pope respond?

VATICAN COUNCIL II CAN BE INTERPRETED RATIONALLY.

Irrespective of the position of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Vatican on Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston, we now know that,  Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally. It is then in harmony with the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantate Domino (1442).

THE REAL ISSUE WITHIN VATICAN COUNCIL II: VISIBLE OR INVISIBLE

 The main issue now is Vatican Council II and not EENS.The real issue within Vatican Council II is how do we interpret LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc ? Do they refer to physically visible or invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in the presen times ?

The premise decides the inference.

Are their physically visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or there are no visible cases ?

ARE THERE PHYSICALLY VISIBLE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE ATHANASIUS CREED ?

Are their physically visible exceptions for the Athanasius Creed or there no such exceptions ?

How do we interpret the Catechisms of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q) ? Is there a rupture or continuity with Tradition in 29Q ( invincible ignorance)?                         

How do we interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church (847-848-invincible ignorance etc)? Do CCC 847-848 contradict CCC 845,846 on outside the Church there is no salvation ?

THERE IS ONLY ONE RATIONAL AND HONEST INTERPRETATION OF VATICAN COUNCIL II

There are two options. Only one of them is honest and rational. Pope Francis and the CDF cannot continue to choose the irrational option. When they say Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition, they have chosen the irrational option.

RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES MUST ONLY INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY.

All the religious communities in New Hampshire, USA should only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. It is also obligatory for the bishop and his curia in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, to only interpret Vatican Council II rationally, like Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior, St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire. So the CDF must ask the Franciscans of the Immaculate, both groups, to only interpret the Council rationally.We have one rationall option - will the liberal bishops and cardinals  in Germany, USA and Britain accept it? - Lionel Andrades

https://wdtprs.com/2023/03/125065/