The SSPX church
St.Mary’s in Kansas City, USA was built since the SSPX compromised on doctrine
and theology. So they were accepted by the liberal archbishop and the secular
authorities.
The videos
hope that the new Church, will be a restoration.But how can there be a
restoration with Cushingite heretical doctrine.The SSPX does not even deny it.
They want to be labeled heretical and schismatic and so avoid being labeled Anti
Semitic and then struck financially.
The SSPX
denies the original interpretation of the Nicene Creed, “I believe in one
baptism for the forgiveness of sins”. They believe in three or more known
baptisms. For me there is only one known baptism, the baptism of water.It is objective visible and repeatable. For them there are the baptisms of desire, blood, invincible
ignorance etc, all without the baptism of water. It has to be without the
baptism of water, otherwise they would be affirming Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).According to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) everyone needs the visible baptism of water for salvation and there can be no known exceptions for us human beings.
They reject
the Athanasius Creed with alleged exceptions and I affirm the Athanasius Creed
with no known exceptions.
They
interpret Vatican Council II irrationally as a break with the Athanasius Creed
etc. I interpret Vatican Council II rationally with the Council being a continuity
with Tradition.
The
Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q and 27Q) contradicts 29Q for them. For me there
is no contradiction.
So with all
this confusion they remain politically correct with the popes and the Left but
in schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium of the Church.Over the centuries they
did not project the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance
as objective exceptions for dogmatic EENS.
For them
there is no Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church
since Vatican Council II has exceptions for EENS.There is no more exclusive
salvation in the Church for them. So they are tolerated politically by the Left. I can
support Traditional Mission since the Council has the hermeneutic of continuity
with EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
I can
proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King based upon traditional EENS. They
cannot. Since they reject traditional EENS with the Council interpreted
irrationally.
I affirm the
Syllabus of Errors which is obsolete for them. The Council has exceptions for
EENS and for an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church. They are at home
with the New Ecumenism and the New Ecclesiology of the liberal popes.For me there cannot be a New Ecumenism and New Ecclesiology since EENS is not contradicted with Vatican Council II.
Religious
Liberty is not an issue for me since the Council affirms the strict
interpretation of EENS in a Catholic State. Religious liberty is an issue for
them.Dignitatis Humane supports traditional Catholic religious liberty in a
Catholic state for me and questions it in a secular state.
They accept Rahner, Ratzinger, Kung, Congar and Murray’s interpretation of Vatican Council II. I reject it. Since like Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon and Ludwig Ott they all chose to interpret the Council with the fake premise which I avoid.
All the books written by SSPX priests and lay authors are now obsolete.
Since we can interpret the Council rationally and the conclusion is different.
We are not obligated to interpret the Council like the SSPX and Pope Francis. Instead
we have a moral obligation not
to interpret Vatican Council II like them.
So how can there be a Restoration with the SSPX? They are part of the problem.- Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment