When Archbishop Carlo Vigano says Vatican Council II should be scrapped, he pleases the liberals. Since he is projecting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. He is a Cushingite. He is choosing the Irrational Premise (invisible people are visible) and Irrational Inference (invisible cases of LG 16 etc are visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus). So his conclusion is nontraditional (Vatican Council II is a rupture and not a continuity with Tradition).

 

When Archbishop Carlo Vigano says Vatican Council II should be scrapped, he pleases the liberals. Since he is projecting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition. He is a Cushingite. He is choosing the Irrational Premise (invisible people are visible) and Irrational Inference (invisible cases of LG 16 etc are visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus). So his conclusion is nontraditional (Vatican Council II is a rupture and not a continuity with Tradition).

SSPX PLEASES THE LIBERALS

Even when the SSPX criticizes Vatican Council II, the liberals are pleased. Since the SSPX is saying that Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition. The SSPX like the liberals use the False Premise (invisible cases are visible in the present times) and so the conclusion has to be a break with Tradition.

It is the same with the cardinals and bishops at the Synod who interpret the Council irrationally, like the traditionalists, and so are politically correct with the Left.

BLOCK AT SYNOD COULD SET THINGS RIGHT

If at the Synod in October there was a block of cardinals and bishops who announced that Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition but a continuity with the Syllabus of Errors, the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X, Feeneyite EENS of the Council of Florence etc, the Catholic Church returns to the past ecclesiology. The Church will then be Feeneyite and not its present Cushingite. People will know that they have choice. They can interpret the Council rationally and honestly. Cushingism creates heresy and schism.

VIGANO IS PART OF THE OFFICIAL HERESY AND SCHISM

Similarly if Archbishop Vigano announces, in some way, that LG 8, 14, 15 and 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to only hypothetical cases in 2023, it will put an end to the present official heresy and schism which he follows along with the traditionalists and Ecclesia Dei communities.

Every time the web blog Rorate Caeili criticizes Vatican Council II the liberals are glad, for it means Rorate is interpreting the Council irrationally and is afraid to interpret the Council rationally.

So Archbishop Vigano and Rorate Caeili do not criticize the liberalism of the cardinals and bishops at the Synod, who interpret Vatican Council II, irrationally, like them.    -Lionel Andrades

JULY 28, 2023

Things have changed in the Church. You can know more tell me that you justify your liberalism with Vatican Council, since I can justify my orthodoxy, also with Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/things-have-changed-in-church-you-can.html

TALKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II BEING IN HARMONY WITH TRADITION AND THERE BEING TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE COUNCIL, ONE IS RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IS IRRATIONAL.

If you are a group of Catholics, liberal or traditionalist, I am willing to speak about this subject. I can present the material on this blog in an orderly way for you to understand quickly what I keep writing about. I available am in Rome ( only Rome) and there is no charge. The information will be given free. It will be illustrated with some graphics and photos.

I am a Catholic and I affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church as I have said often on this blog.

The difference between me and Catholics in general and also the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican,  is that they interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms, Councils etc  irrationally and I am rational.

I choose a rational premise and inference and so my conclusion is traditional.

The presentation could take 20 minutes or less.I will be available to answer questions.I do not have any new theology to offer. I simply avoid an irrational observation and we return to the old theology of the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century at the Latin Mass. This would be the general theology today, which is honest and rational, at every Mass and every Rite. It would have to be the lex orandi.

Please e-mail me at : lionelandrades10@gmail.com

p.s I do not have a telephone contact number and do not travel out of Rome.

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA

Lionel Andrades

Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1