The Judges at the Vatican’s Supreme Tribunal (Signatura) are not competent to judge since they are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and this is unethical.

 

The Judges at the Vatican’s Supreme Tribunal (Signatura) are not competent to judge since they are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally and this is unethical. For them LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the rest of Tradition. They do not affirm Feeneyite EENS i.e EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).

This is unethical. Cardinal Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj and the Canonist Associations are not correcting the mistake of the judges.

How can these judges confuse what is invisible as being visible? It is as if their objective reality is not the same as the rest of us humans.

Even the judges at the secular Constitutional Court, Rome, who have a Catholic background, are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. The Jurisprudence Department of La Sapienza University, Rome is also teaching the same error on Vatican Council II, to students.

Interestingly, La Sapienza University was founded by a pope who supported the dogma EENS. We now know that EENS is not contradicted by Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally. So students can affirm EENS and Vatican Council II. It is not either-or any more.

CONCORDAT OF 1929

How do the judges of the Constitutional Court of Justice, Rome interpret the Concordat, is it with Vatican Council II, rational or irrational?

Vatican Council II rational is in harmony with the theology of the 1929 Concordat. The Church and the Italian State must go back to Tradition.

The political parties, of Giorgia Melloni and Matteo Salvini must interpret Vatican Council II rationally. Then there is no rupture with the understanding of Church, as it was known over the centuries in Italy.The Catholic Church will not be able to support LGBT-sex in the name of Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.-Lionel Andrades