Archbishop Guido Pozzo at Ecclesia Dei and Pope
Benedict would say that Vatican Council II had the hermeneutic of continuity
with Tradition and they would also say that it had the development of doctrine,
or hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. They would speak in two ways.
Of course the blue orthodox passages in Vatican
Council II could be cited to say that the Council had a continuity with
Tradition. This was useful when they were talking to the traditionalists.
But when they wanted to please the Left and the
liberals they could interpret the red passages irrationally and so Vatican
Council II would have a rupture with the blue orthodox passages –and also
Tradition in general, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus EENS, etc.
Pope Benedict clarified once, that EENS today was no
more like it was for the missionaries of the 16th century. There was
a development of doctrine he said, with Vatican Council II. He meant the Council
was a break with Tradition, when he would interpret invisible cases of LG
8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being visible exceptions for the dogma
EENS.
Of course, he was repeating the error of Pope Pius XII
in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. It confused
invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance
as being visible exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council
and the Council of Florence.
Now in 2023 we can choose to interpret Vatican Council
II only rationally and so in harmony with Tradition. We can always choose the
hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and the
Catechisms of Trent and Pius X. We do not have to interpret the Council like
Pope Francis and the cardinals and bishops.
The recent document on homosexual, like Amoris Laetitia and Traditionis Custode, is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. The red passages are knowingly interpreted irrationally. This cannot be Magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. Lionel Andrades
No comments:
Post a Comment