Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus of Pope John Paul
II were issued with the irrational interpretation of the red passages in
Vatican Council II. The public error is there for all to see.
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, interpreted the invisible and hypothetical cases in the red passages as being objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. So he assumed that invisible cases were physically visible. Only visible cases, objective examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church, can be exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.If someone does not exist in our reality, he cannot be an exception for the past ecclesiocentrism.He does not contradict the dogma EENS.
For example, if there is an apple in a box of oranges then then apple is an exception since it is different but also becuase it is there in that box. If it was not there in that box it would not be an exception.
Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, as being exceptions for the dogma EENS. So he implied that these were non-hypothetical, objective cases, known in the present times.
This is irrational but with this reasoning he created exceptions for Tradition and then issued Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus etc.
When what is invisible is seen as being visible I call it Cushingism.
When what is invisible is seen as being invisible only, I call it Feeneyism.
Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus are Cushingite. The Athanasius Creed, for example. which says all need Catholic faith for salvation, is Feeneyite, for me. I interpret it without exceptions. Probably a Cushingite could interpreted it differently, with exceptions.
Similarly Vatican Council II is Feeneyite for me. I interpret it without it having exceptions for the dogma EENS etc.In general Vatican Council II is Cushingite, for just about everyone.
Cushingism is liberalism.Pope Paul VI brought this liberalism into the Church by interpreting the red hypothetical passages irrationally. He confused what is invisible as being visible and no one corrected him. Then it was claimed that Vatican Council II was a break with Tradition, it was a revolution in the Church, it was a new revelation, when all they were really doing was mixing up what is invisible as being visible and so producing a non traditional conclusion.-Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 11, 2014
Two Catholic Conferences this week end: how would they interpret Redemptoris Missio?
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2014
What a mess !
1949:
Christ on earth.-Letter of the Holy Office 1949
In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects, necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. -Letter of the Holy Office 1949
FACTUAL ERRORS IN THE LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949
Bishop Charles Morerod in a doctrinal error says the SSPX cannot use Catholic Churches because of a doctrinal issue
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/sspx-get-smart.html
FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 2014
Most Catholic priests are using the irrational, right-hand side column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Bishop Bernard Fellay have used the irrational column http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/archbishop-marcel-lefebvre-and-bishop.html#links
Roman Forum Summer Conference this month will use the right hand side column in the interpretation of Vatican Council II http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/roman-forum-summer-conference-this.html#links
There are Catholic religious and lay persons who use the the left hand side column in the interpretation of magisterial text http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/there-are-catholic-religious-and-lay.html#links
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and Bishop Bernard Fellay have used the irrational column
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
implicit or explicit for us.
hypothetical or known in reality.
invisible or visible in the flesh.
dejure ( in principle) or defacto ( in fact ).
subjective or objective
So one can choose from the left hand side or the right hand side column.
If the right hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition in general on other religions and Christian communities and churches. There are known exceptions in 2014 to the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Cathlic Church. The dead- saved are visible.
If the left hand side column is chosen then Vatican Council II does not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus, nor Tradition on other religions and Christian communities and churches.
Most people interpret Vatican Council II with the right hand side values.
3
SUNDAY, JUNE 15, 2014
SSPX considers Nostra Aetate an exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechism of Pope Pius X-this is heresy and irrationality
All salvation referred to in Vatican Council II i.e saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16), imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3),seeds of the Word (AG 11), good and holy things in other religions (NA 2) etc are either:
No comments:
Post a Comment