April 28, 2017
Bishop Fellay does not realize that he is confused between Feeneyism and Cushingism
The
dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed
surreptitiously by confused ideas wrote Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior
General of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX).1 He does not realize that it is he,
who is confused between Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation
of the dogma. That same confusion he extends to Vatican Council II.He
then makes the same error in the interpretation of the Catechism of Pope
Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995).
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known
exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit
cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It
is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there
are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need
for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of
desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle
hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
So
when he interprets invincible ignorance in the Catechism of Pope Pius X
he assumes it refers to a visible case and so is an exception to
outside the Church no salvation ( Feeneyite).
When I interpret invincible ignorance for example, in the Catechism of Pope Pius X it refers to an invisible case.
For
Father Pier Paulo Petrucci, Superior, SSPX, Italy the baptism of desire
refers to a visible case. So Vatican Council II has a rupture with the
dogma outside the Church there is no salvation( Feeneyite).He is a
Cushingite like Bishop Bernard Fellay.
For me
Lionel, the baptism of desire and blood with or without the baptism of
water in the Catholic Church refers to a physically invisible case. So
it cannot be relevant or an exception to the dogma EENS, as it was known
to the 16th century missionaries.2
Bishop Bernard Fellay could also clarify that I Lionel Andrades interpret Vatican Council II without an irrational premise and so my conclusion is different from his and the SSPX bishops and priests.It is the same with the dogma EENS.
This is Vatican Council II Feeneyite for me with these diagrams.
-Lionel Andrades
1.
2.
January 12, 2016
If the SSPX bishops and Fr.Pierpaulo Petrucci would admit that the baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in 2016, the entire interpretation of Vatican Council changes : error in the article
Fr. Pier Paolo Petrucci, Superior General,SSPX ,Italy makes the familiar SSPX error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/fr-pier-paolo-petrucci-superior.html
JULY 20, 2015
No response from Fraternita Sacerdotale San Pio X (SSPX Italy) : doctrinal mess http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/no-response-from-fraternita-sacerdotale.html
________________________________________________________
October 18, 2012
October 19, 2012
RAMPANT HERESY IN THE SSPX
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/rampant-heresy-in-sspx.html
SSPX DISTRICT ITALY CONFERENCE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/sspc-district-italy-conference-
October 17, 2012
October 17, 2012
Will Bishop Bernard Fellay give up Church teachings to protect the SSPX?
Vatican Council II can be accepted by the SSPX in accord with the dogma extra eccleesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.This will be a Vatican Council without the visible dead theory. It will be the Jewish Left who will oppose this interpretation of Vatican Council. Vatican Council II would be anti Semitic.
At Akita, Our Lady told the seer that
there will come a time when bishops will be against bishops and
cardinals against cardinals. At Fatima she said the Faith will be lost
(except in Portugal). Rome will lose the Faith, she said, at La Salle.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/04/bishop-fellay-does-not-realize-that-he.html
__________________________________________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment