Dr.Taylor Marshall supported Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, along with Bishop Olsen and the FSSP priests at the Fisher More College. He opposed Dr. Dudley and the faculty, which correctly rejected Vatican Council II( Cushingite). Until today he does not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite); the Council interpreted rationally in harmony with Tradition.He is a speaker at the controversial Catholic Identity Conference, where the criteria for being being a Catholic speaker is being approved by the political Left.

Dr.Taylor Marshall supported Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, along with Bishop Olsen and the FSSP priests at the Fisher More College. He opposed Dr. Dudley and the faculty, which correctly rejected Vatican Council II( Cushingite). Until today he does not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite); the Council interpreted rationally in harmony with Tradition.He is a speaker at the controversial Catholic Identity Conference, where the criteria for being being a Catholic speaker is being approved by the political Left.

Traditionalists who are sedevacantists cannot speak at the CIC and neither can those who affirm Feeneyite EENS and reject BOD, BOB and I.I as being practical exceptions to EENS. Only those Catholics are allowed to speak who interpret invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I, as being visible exceptions to EENS.

Since with this irrationality a schism is created with the past popes before Pius XII, on EENS, Athanasius Creed,Nicene Creed, past ecclesiology, past ecumenism,Syllabus of Errors, mission based on exclusive salvation in the Church etc. The CIC speakers meet all thse heretical and schismatic conditions of the Left.

There can be no uniting the clans with the traditionalists in Bishop Richard Williamson's community.Chris  Ferrara and Michael Matt have to stay financially correct.

How can the speakers have a Catholic Identity when they reject EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century?

-Lionel Andrades