This is schism based upon doctrine and not just discipline or pastoral exercises

The priest at Mass yesterday evening- like Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), did not say that all non Catholics need to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for salvation (AG 7, Vatican Council II). Instead he said in Italian 'Dio ha dato salvezza per tutti'( God has given salvation to all/ for all).At Abu Dhabi too the pope was saying God has given salvation to all.

This priest, like Pope Francis, interprets Vatican Council II mixing up what is invisible as visible, subjective  as objective.So Lumen Gentium  8, 14 and 16 would refer  to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church instead of invisible and theoretical cases , who if they existed  would be known only to God.

So if there can be one alleged exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , there can be two, or many, or most...

This is how Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II and then concludes that there is a reasonable hope that most men are saved. 

Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II like the present two popes and the traditionalists.

It is the same  for Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, John Henry Weston, Bradley Eli, Christine Niles and the EWTN apologists.

Salvation is open to all in potential but to receive  this salvation a person must respond. Even the Protestants believe that a person must respond with faith in Jesus.

St. Faustina Kowalska  says God is merciful and his mercy is there for all.She also says God is just.So to  receive this mercy a Catholic must respond with repentance, the Divine Mercy Prayer, a change from a life of sin etc.

Instead this young priest phrased his sentence in such a way as to say that all will be saved even if they do not accept Jesus in the Catholic Church; without faith and baptism(AG 7).

There is a schism in the Church approved by the Left.Doctrinally, it is a negation of EENS with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.It is done with an irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance. They are invisible cases but are projected as being visible and personally known. Then it is assumed that there are objective exceptions to EENS, exclusivist ecclesiolgy, ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed on outside the Church there is no salvation, the Syllabus of Errors and a new understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed.This is schism based on doctrine and not just discipline or pastoral excercises.

-Lionel Andrades