Speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference(CIC) are in schism with the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc.They interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to maintain the common schism with the Left. In this way they remain speakers at these conferences.

Speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference(CIC) are in schism with the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc.They interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise  to maintain the common schism with the Left. In this way they remain speakers at these conferences.

I have repeated this many times and they do not deny it every year.Some of them are professional Catholics, who use words like 'traditionalists' to describe themselves  but are in manifest mortal sins of faith.

They talk about the importance of doctrine but  interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and baptism.Then this irrationality is applied in principle  to all magisterial documents  to elicit a rupture with Tradition, which keeps them afloat financially.Since the schism is enforced by the Left.

If they did not affirm BOD, BOB and I.I irrationally they would be proclaiming traditional Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors.They would no more be modernist. This would put them at odds with a schismatic Catholic Church.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the present two popes, the non Catholic Left, USCCB, Bishops  Conferences, SSPX, Una Voce, Latin Mass Societies etc are a part of it.

-Lionel Andrades