Peter and Michael Dimond had interpreted Vatican Council II wrongly all these years by assuming Lumen Gentium was an exception to their interpretation of exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.There is still no announcement from them acknowledging the error.They need to admit that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, do not contradict their strict interpretation of outside the Church there is no salvation. So they had made a mistake on Vatican Council II, like the other sedevacantists.-Lionel Andrades
June 27, 2016
St.Robert Bellarmine and St. Augustine were Feeneyite in their ecclesiology as were the popes of their times.The popes since Pius XII to Pope Francis have accepted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949
June 27, 2016
Both of them would at times refer to an EENS or a Vatican Council II which is Cushingite or Feeneyite, I could just watch the mix up,sadly.I could see through the mistake they are both making innocently
June 27, 2016
Bishop Robert Sanborn and Dr.Robert Fastiggi are unaware of Cushing theology and irrational reasoning : at the centre of their debate is really the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
June 27, 2016
Ecclesiology Debate: Bp. Donald Sanborn vs. Dr. Robert Fastiggi (2004) : irrational non traditional Cushingite theology adopted
Bishop
Sanborn uses situation ethics, subjectivism and known exceptions to
EENS, as a reasoning, to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with
Tradition.The liberals do the same
http://eucharistandmission.
The sedevacantist Bishop Sanborn uses Cushingism to interpret Vatican Council II and seems unaware of the Feeneyite choice
Ave
Maria University like the sedevacantist seminary in Florida uses
irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism to interpret
Vatican Council II
______________________________
April 26, 2016
Bishop Donald Sanborn hiding the truth
Florida seminaries and universities unaware: Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the theology of Feeneyism or Cushingism
Vatican Council II and Islam : two interpretations
At the 'New Traditional College' will the faculty interpret magisterial documents with Feeneyism or Cushingism ? http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantists
after months of discussions cannot answer if Lumen Gentium 16 is
explicit or implicit and if it is an exception to the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus
Sedevacantists are teaching irrationality
Sedevacantists
after months of discussions cannot answer if Lumen Gentium 16 is
explicit or implicit and if it is an exception to the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus
Sedevacantists are teaching irrationality
http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantist seminary repeats the error of the Baltimore Catechism
http://eucharistandmission.
Bishop Donald Sanborn like Bishop Fellay has made the same mistake : so have Reuters and AP correspondents
http://eucharistandmission.Sedevacantist seminary repeats the error of the Baltimore Catechism
Holy Trinity Seminary does not clarify if they refer to Vatican Council II in which LG 16, LG 8 is visible or invisible
Sedevacantist article on ecclesiology has the same connfusion as the Pontifical universities and seminaries which they call 'modernist'.
http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantist and Roman bishops and clergy want to remain politically correct
http://eucharistandmission.
Bishop Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada do not have a single source to support their position. Not a single reference!
http://eucharistandmission.
Four months and the sedevacantists will not answer if LG 16 is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.
Wikipedia and Most Holy Trinity,Florida sedevacantist seminary make the same error http://
Does BOD and I.I refer to visible or invisible cases in 2015 where you live? is a difficult question for a sedevacantist priest
http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantist and Roman bishops and clergy want to remain politically correct
http://eucharistandmission.
Bishop Sanborn and Fr.Anthony Cekada do not have a single source to support their position. Not a single reference!
http://eucharistandmission.
Four months and the sedevacantists will not answer if LG 16 is an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
http://eucharistandmission.
Wikipedia and Most Holy Trinity,Florida sedevacantist seminary make the same error http://
Does BOD and I.I refer to visible or invisible cases in 2015 where you live? is a difficult question for a sedevacantist priest
http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantist seminary is not aware of superflous passages in Vatican Council II originating from the 1949 Marchetti error
http://eucharistandmission.
Most Rev. Donald Sanborn, Fr. Cekada, Fr. Joseph Selway, Fr. Nicolas Désposito, Rev. Julian Larrabee.- ALL SILENT
There is a mistake on the webpage of the sedevacantist Most Holy Trinity seminary. No one issues a correction/clarification
edevacantist
Most Holy Trinity Seminary Fl. since Oct. 10, 2015 does not clarify if
in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8) refers to persons visible or
invisible.
You can interpret Vatican Council II without the new theology. Try it and see
The Baptism of Desire refers to invisible cases. This is common sense. If a pope or saint says otherwise it would be wrong.
Another baptism of desire list in which it is assumed that the deceased are visible to us http://eucharistandmission.
Sedevacantists
do not realize that the baptism of desire will always be invisible for
us. This is not a theory of mine. It is a fact of life.
http://eucharistandmission.
______________________________
______________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment