Sr.Elisa Ann Nutt will defend her doctoral thesis tomorrow at the Angelicum University and her moderator will be Prof.Rev.Fr.Wojciech Giertych o.p, the papal theologian.They both will interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) irrationally.They will obediently use a false premise to interpret magisterial document.This is expected of them.Their superiors and the present two popes do the same.
Interestingly Sr.Elisa's subject is The Vow of Religious Obedience : Submission to Imposed Authority or Sign of Christian Maturity ?. Light from St. Thomas Aquinas.
Sr. Elisa will be interpreting Unitatis Redintigratio, Decree on Ecumenism, in Vatican Council II, irrationally.She will probably teach it to others.They will obediently follow the error.
She will also interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and 16th century EENS. This would be being obedient for her. All students and professors at the Angelicum are expected to interpret the Council as a rupture with Tradition.
The traditional doctrine on exclusive salvation has been changed by assuming that there are known cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I).They are assumed to be practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
So Prof. Wojciech Giertych o.p will support the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.It wrongly interpreted unknown cases of BOD, BOB and I.I as being personally known examples of salvation outside the Church.They were mistaken as being literal exceptions to the dogma EENS.
The present two popes and the Left also accept the Letter of the Holy Office which Fr. Karl Rahner sj placed in the Denzinger, with the objective error.
So doctrine on salvation has been changed for the Polish priest and the rest of the Dominicans teaching at the Angelicum.
Sr. Elisa would have had her formation at the Angelicum assuming invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, were visible examples of salvation outside the Church. So they are a rupture with Tradition.
She will be obedient to this new teaching.
This is the new teaching which will be imposed upon her as it is imposed upon Catholics in general.
To reject the dogma EENS and the Athanasius Creed which affirms EENS is heresy.
To change the meaning of the Nicene Creed with alleged visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I is also heresy.
To change the interpretation of the Catechisms by assuming there are known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, is also heresy.
She will be obedient to all this heresy and scandal which will be imposed upon her, when she goes back home.
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment