The autumn general assembly of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Baltimore Nov. 13, 2019, did not discuss how Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) - and Massimo Faggioli has no comment on this.

The autumn  general assembly of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Baltimore Nov. 13, 2019, did not discuss how Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) - and Massimo Faggioli has no comment on this.

 

 Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters' liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter  had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.1

All the U.S bishops at their fall gathering make the same mistake as was made by Faggioli and Winters. 

They approved the revised document on strategic priorities for 2021 to 2024 (evangelization, vocations, life and dignity of the human person, the protection of children) writes Faggioli, in Commonweal.2   He does not mention how the Council can be re-interpreted in harmony with Tradition.

 These are great days- when I say that Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the traditionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM- and there is no denial from them.
When I say this I assume Faggioli and Winters  will interpret the Council  rationally and honestly. 3

As adult, responsible men, the U.S bishops, like Faggioli  will not  claim that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to real people in 2019, 'physical bodies' in Newton's time and space.This is a being honest.

So the bishops must know, like Massimo Faggioli and Michail Sean Winters, that they can no more interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).

Such an important issue was missing from the agenda of the bishops assembly when they discussed evangelisation, vocations etc, all based upon the irrational interpretation of the Council.

For Faggioli and Winters, the 50 years interpretation of the Council is over. It violated common sense.It contradicted the Principle of Non Contradiction.-Lionel Andrades

  1

November 20, 2019

Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html

 

 

2 

Adrift & Alone

The Bishops Meet, and Miss the Point

By Massimo Faggioli

 https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/adrift-alone

3

 

November 19, 2019

Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ? 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-and-massimo.html

_____________________________________________________