Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano mentions the doctrinal chaos in the Church not the doctrinal chaos among the the bishops and priests of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) who interpret the Creeds and Catechisms with an irrationality and do the same for Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
The Catechism of Pope Pius X contradicts the Athanasius Creed for them and the Catechism of the Council of Trent is a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. This is their lex credendi.
It is with a hermeneutic of rupture, created by the fake premise which the SSPX uses, that they offer Holy Mass in Latin.Their Mass is a rupture with the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass and the Greek Byzantine Mass of the centuries.
They don't know that they are in a doctrinal mess because they interpret the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance irrationally. Then they put the blame on the Novus Ordo Mass and Vatican Council II.
Bishop Bernard Fellay would ask the Vatican to resolve the doctrinal problem in the Church as if they had the answers. He did not know that the popes and cardinals were also interpreting the Council with the same fake premise which created heresy and schism.
Inspite of so many reports on the media, the SSPX is not aware of the fake premise which they depend upon to interpret Vatican Council.Then they are disappointed with the non traditional result and then blame the Council and not their faulty premise.
So in their ignorance they criticize the Council for being in schism with the past Magisterium- and not the false premise which they use to create the schism, approved by the liberals and the Left.
They oppose Tradition and call themselves traditionalists.
It is with these same errors that Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano interprets Magisterial documents unaware of his doctrinal chaos.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment