The SSPX priest who will offer Sunday Mass today has a different understanding of the Nicene Creed.It is different from mine

 The SSPX priest who will offer Sunday Mass today has a different understanding of the Nicene Creed.It is different from mine. It is the same with the priests who offer  Holy Mass in Italian or English in Rome's main line churches.The SSPX priests who offer the Latin Mass and the priests who offer Mass in Italian today in Rome have the same understanding of the Nicene Creed. Since both groups use the same false premise.

However their Profession of Faith is different from mine since we interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) differently. 

The SSPX priest will use the false premise like the popes, cardinals and bishops who offer Mass in other Rites.

This error came into the Catholic Church with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.The popes and the SSPX accept the LOHO.

LOHO created a New Theology based upon a false premise. So there emerged two interpretations of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. 1)EENS with exceptions and 2)EENS without exceptions.

We can now also interpret Vatican Council II with 1)exceptions for EENS and 2) Vatican Council II  with no exceptions for EENS. The Council can  be a rupture with EENS or in harmony with EENS.

The Nicene Creed indicates that 1) we believe in one baptism , which is the baptism of water. This is how I interpret it. But for others,it is 2) we believe in three or more 'baptisms' which exclude the baptism of water, in the Catholic Church.So they are practical exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.This is irrational but this is the interpretation of the SSPX and the popes, cardinals and bishops.-Lionel Andrades