The cardinals associated with the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Italy as advisers are all Christocentric but not ecclesiocentric. They use the false premise

 The cardinals associated with the Dignitatis Humanae Institute, Italy as advisers are all Christocentric but not ecclesiocentric. They use the false premise to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( with no exceptions of hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire etc ) and Vatican Council II( with LG 8, UR 3, LG 16 not being practical  exceptions to Feeneyite EENS).

Instead they choose a Vatican Council II and EENS interpreted with exceptions.

This is schismatic.It is division with the past Magisterium of the Church.The division is created with a false premise.

How can a cardinal reject the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation ? -Lionel Andrades