This New Information is difficult for Michael Sean Winters at the National Catholic Reporter to handle.
In his recent report on Vatican Council II and Catechesis he does not want to highlight the difference between the Council interpreted with or without a false premise. The conclusion is a rupture or continuity with Tradition.He simply refers to Vatican Council II, in other words, Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise.
But now there really is no more a Vatican Council II with a false premise. It is obsolete. We know that the Council interpreted with the fake premise is responsible for the rupture with Tradition.
An interpretation of Vatican Council II based on deception cannot be Magisterial even if the pope uses it for whatever reason.
For me Pope Francis can no more cite Vatican Council II to support his progessivist agenda since the Council is Feeneyite and traditional.The only way he can cite the Council is by using a false premise.
Ad Gentes 7 says outside the Church there is no salvation when it points out that all need faith and baptism for salvation. While hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions to Ad Gentes 7.
There is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict an ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.The Council supports the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q).-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 16, 2021
The Council is the Magisterium of the Church when the Council is interpreted without the false premise and does not contradict the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. When the Council is interpreted with a false premise, as is the interpretation of the present two popes, it is human error and is not inspired by the Holy Spirit
FEBRUARY 16, 2021
Michael Sean Winters is unethical.He interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise even after knowing there is a rational alternative.It would make him a Feeneyite
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/02/michael-sean-winters-is-unethicalhe.html
JANUARY 16, 2021
This New Information on the false premise, the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise and the Council being in harmony with the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus is being brought out by a layman
DECEMBER 20, 2020
This New Information on the false premise, the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise and the Council being in harmony with the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus is being brought out by a layman
This New Information on the false premise, the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise and the Council being in harmony with the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus is being brought out by me, a layman. It is still not being made known by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or the Lefebvrists. -Lionel Andrades
NEW INFORMATION
We have new information and it is here only on this blog.
1.The hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition depends upon the false premise and not Vatican Council II itself.
2.Irrespective if you are a conservative or liberal Catholic, if you use the false premise there is a rupture with Tradition.
3.If you are a liberal Catholic and do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you become a traditionalist who can affirm the stict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
4. If you are a traditionalist and you do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, you can easily become a Feeneyite.
5. So irrespective of the Rite of the Mass, Latin or Novus Ordo, if you interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise you can easily become a traditionalist or conservative Catholic, affirming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with Traditional Catholic Mission. -Lionel Andrades
DECEMBER 14, 2020
With the New Information only on this blog, Eucharist and Mission, the Society of St.Pius X can ask for canonical recognition
DECEMBER 12, 2020
This New Information on how the false premise decides the hermeneutic of rupture or discontinuity with Tradition, is being given out my me. This is the job of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faithhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/this-new-information-on-how-false.html
______________________APRIL 28, 2018
How can LG 8 be an exception to EENS Cardinal Ladaria ?
APRIL 28, 2018
No denial from the Vatican, SSPX or Paulist Fathers : they all still agree with me
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/no-denial-from-vatiacan-sspx-or-paulist.html
_________________________
SEPTEMBER 26, 2018
Ask the CDF (Graphics)
-
(The above graphic was made in 2o18.It applies also to 2020)
|
FEBRUARY 1, 2020
We can affirm Vatican Council II without the Ratzinger theology ( Graphics)
-Lionel Andrades___________________DECEMBER 17, 2020__________________DECEMBER 14, 2020Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents DECEMBER 17, 2020According to Archbishop Thomas Gullickson there are no cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance in our reality and so they are not objective exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Amercian Archbishop is not using the false premise DECEMBER 17, 2020According to Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, the former Rector and Dean of Theology at the University of St. Anselm, Rome, and present Abbot of the Benedictine Monastery of Praglia, Padua, Italy, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are not exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to St. BenedictDECEMBER 17, 2020According to John Martignoni, Catholic apologist at EWTN, the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, are 'zero cases'. So they cannot be exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) DECEMBER 17, 2020Pope Benedict would know that there is no 'development of doctrine with Vatican Council II' if the false premise is not used. But he is going along with itDECEMBER 16, 2020With these Five Points the religious formation of Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelites, Salesians and other communities change DECEMBER 16, 2020The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican needs to inform Cardinal Braz de Avez and the religious communities that there are two interpretations of Vatican Council II - with and without the false premise,and they should choose the rational optionDECEMBER 16, 2020The Dominicans and Benedictines at Oxford University need to stop churning out theologies created with Pope Benedict's false New Theology and fake premise DECEMBER 16, 2020The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must clarify the Five Points for young people with a vocation to the religous life and for Vocation Directors and Novice MastersDECEMBER 16, 2020The SSPX can now ask Pope Francis to affirm Vatican Council II just as he had asked it of them, for canonical recognition.With the Five Points ask him to affirm the Council with the hermeneutic of continuity with EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle AgesDECEMBER 16, 2020Jesuit Pope Francis needs to end the slander of the Jesuit from Boston. Fr.Leonard Feeney was correct and Boston College, the Jesuit Provincial in the USA and Cardinal Richard Cushing made an objective error- supported by Pope Pius XII and his cardinals DECEMBER 16, 2020The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St.Benedict Centers in New England, USA must not be forced by Cardinal Sean O'Malley, Archbishop of Boston and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, to re-interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with a false premise. DECEMBER 16, 2020Pope Benedict has said that Europe must remember its Christian roots but Europe's Christian roots were Catholic. Peter Seewalds new biography shows that Pope Benedict lost his Catholic Faith and the Catholic theological rootsDECEMBER 16, 2020Peter Seewalds new biography indicates Pope Benedict used a false premise to reject Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), change the Nicene Creed, reject the Athanasius Creed, reject the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, reject the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q) and irrationally reinterpret the Council of Trent and Vatican Council II.So in general the Deposit of the Faith is rejected.De fide teachings which are obligatory to believe in are put asideDECEMBER 13, 2020
If the Lefebvrists continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, and not without it, the Council will continue to be a break with Tradition and this will not be the fault of Pope BenedictDECEMBER 15, 2020Peter Seewald missed out the most important point. Cardinal Ratzinger used a false premise to create a new Theology
_________________
-Lionel Andrades
If the Lefebvrists continue to interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise, and not without it, the Council will continue to be a break with Tradition and this will not be the fault of Pope BenedictDecember 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNewsA new authoritative biography of Pope Benedict XVI written by Peter Seewald describes in detail the important role then-Professor Joseph Ratzinger played before and during the Second Vatican Council. His influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.- Maike Hickson, New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii
With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS 1 we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II, and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
1
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/12/five-points-that-change-our.htmlDECEMBER 14, 2020With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with TraditionDECEMBER 16, 2020Religious formation in the Catholic Church has changed with these Five Points__________________________
December 11, 2020 (LifeSiteNewsA new authoritative biography of Pope Benedict XVI written by Peter Seewald describes in detail the important role then-Professor Joseph Ratzinger played before and during the Second Vatican Council. His influence helped to bring about a revolutionary change of the Council's direction, tone, and topics.- Maike Hickson, New biography describes great influence of Joseph Ratzinger in the revolutionary upheaval of Vatican II
https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/new-biography-describes-great-influence-of-joseph-ratzinger-in-the-revolutionary-upheaval-of-vatican-ii
With the knowledge of these FIVE POINTS 1 we can undo Cardinal Ratzinger's influence at Vatican Council II, and when he did not choose to interpret the Council after 1965, in continuity with Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
1
DECEMBER 14, 2020
Five points that change our interpretation of Vatican Council II and other Magisterial documents
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment