Pope Francis supports the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal
Richard Cushing, the Rector of Boston College and the American Jesuits. This is
not Magisterial. Heresy and schism are not Magisterial. Even Michael Voris and
Michael Lofton affirm the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office
to the Archbishop of Boston. It is repeated at Vatican Council II.
I avoid this mistake.
For me, the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance
are always hypothetical on earth for us human beings. They are not literal
cases. They are not explicit. So they are not exceptions for Tradition. They do
not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and an ecumenism of
return to the Church.
In Rome, Father Federico Montani is the SSPX priest who offers the Latin
Mass at the SSPX chapel. He told me he supports the dogma EENS according to the
Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) and the
Catechisms of Pope Pius IX and Trent.
But because of the Boston Heresy, which the SSPX also support, like Voris and Lofton, he does not accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
This is understandable. Since with the Boston Heresy- confusing what is invisible as being visible, - Vatican Council II contradicts EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the past Catechisms and the rest of Tradition.Everyone should reject Vatican Council II ( irrational).
Even I would not interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and
Catechisms, with the Boston Heresy.
But Fr. Federico Montani affirms the dogma EENS according to the Fourth
Lateran Council and the Council of Florence etc. Voris and Lofton do not do so.
They re-interpret the Creeds with the Boston Heresy. So there are ‘known
exceptions’ for the dogma EENS. It is the same for Pope Francis. This is
approved by the Left since it changes the interpretation of not only the dogma
EENS but also the Creeds and Catechisms.So the Left forces them to abjure the Catholic Faith in reality
So how can Voris and Lofton say that SSPX are in schism when they both,
like Pope Francis, are in the same theological boat, a sinking ship, which is
not the Catholic Church. They follow the political theology of the Left.
Instead Voris and Lofton should be interpreting Vatican Council II rationally
and calling upon the SSPX, to do the same.
When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally the Council only
supports the ecclesiology of the 1962 Missal which says outside the Church
there is no salvation.
They should be asking Pope Francis to become a traditionalist by
interpreting the Councils and Catechisms rationally. Do not use the common
false premise, the false inference and nontraditional, heretical and schismatic
conclusion.
Voris and Lofton for political reasons must not support the Boston Heresy
of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. This is not Catholic.
Outside the Church there is no salvation is the teaching of Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7-Lumen Gentium 16, Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846 etc) but the present popes are in schism, which is produced by the Boston Heresy. They can correct the error and then the whole Church returns to Tradition.There no more is general schism in the Church. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
SSPX priest is unethical on Vatican Council II
MARCH 6, 2023
SSPX's Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestlyhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/sspxs-father-federico-montani-must-only.html
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
If the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II rationally their image changes
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment