The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public.

 

The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public. The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond, New Hampshire, in the diocese of Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of Manchester, USA, avoid this error. They interpret Vatican Council II etc, rationally.

The Boston Heresy is an objective error and is verifiable in public, I repeat.

If Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition it means the Boston Heresy is being applied.

If Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition then it means that the Boston Heresy is avoided.

If Lumen Gentium 8, 14, 16 etc refer to visible cases then it means that the Boston Heresy is in operation.

If LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to invisible cases , it means we are back to the old theology and the Boston Heresy has been avoided.

So when Pope Francis says that the Council is a break with Tradition, this is true with the Boston Heresy.

When I say that the Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition, this is true, because I avoid the Boston Heresy.

When the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), this was irrational. The result was heresy. The 1949 LOHO says everyone does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. This contradicts the dogma EENS which says they do need to be a member. 

But only visible cases can be exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Invisible people do not contradict the dogma EENS.So the 1949 LOHO is telling us in public, that it’s reasoning was irrational. In this way it could produce a New Theology with new doctrines on salvation. This is heresy. It is schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium. This is a public error. The proof if there in the text of LOHO.

When Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj cites the 1949 LOHO approved by Pope  Pius XII in two papers of the International Theological Commission, they are telling us they choose the Boston Heresy. This is public.

When the liberals placed the LOHO in the Denzinger and referenced it in Vatican Council II( LG16), they were saying there were visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc. This is irrational. This is dishonest. There are no visible cases. But in this way they produce new doctrines on salvation and reject EENS according to the Council of Florence 1442 and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X. This is heresy. This is the heresy in Boston in 1949.It is official.

When the entire Church today, changes ecclesiology, then the error is explicit. The cause of the break with Tradition is Vatican Council II (irrational) and the precise cause is the irrational premise (invisible people are visible) which produces a new theology, which is heretical. This is the Boston Heresy of the 1949 LOHO, an error overlooked by Pope Pius XII and also the popes who followed him.  - Lionel Andrades