Throw those books out, which are written by Fr.Franz Schmidberger, Roberto dei Mattei, Fr. Jean Marie Glieze and Fr. Francois Laisney. They have all interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture and not a continuation with Tradition. They are written with an irrational and not rational premise. We can now interpret Vatican Council II rationally and the conclusion has to be traditional. This was not known to Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the Hildebrands and Michael Davis. They were interpreting Vatican Council II like the liberals.
Now Fr. Davide Pagliarani and Bishop Bernard Fellay do not want to interpret Vatican Council II rationally since they will be labeled as Anti Semitic. The Council will no more contradict the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So the SSPX continues to support a schism with the past Magisterium and will intentionally choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, since it in their financial interest.
The talks given by Peter Kwasniewski and the reports by Don Leone on the blog Rorate Caeili, are based upon politically correct, Vatican Council II interpreted dishonestly.
This is approved by Pope Francis.The SSPX Angelus Press may not be allowed by the Jewish Left to publish new books in which LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical and theoretical cases. Othwerwise, with Vatican Council II interpreted, 1) the ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II is the same. 2) There is no development of doctrine and 3) the liberal-traditionalist division ends, since theological liberalism ends. -Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 9, 2021
Roberto dei Mattei is still not clarifying that he made a mistake . He interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise and is still doing the same today. His books on the Council were written with irrational Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism
Roberto dei Mattei is still not clarifying that he made a mistake . He interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise and is still doing the same today. His books on the Council were written with irrational Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism. - Lionel Andrades
JANUARY 8, 2021
If you have Roberto dei Mattei's book on Vatican Council II throw it out.He has superficially read the Council and used the false premise like the liberals and the Vatican.If you have Taylor Marshall's book on Vatican Council II throw it out too. The same with Chris Ferrara
If you have Roberto dei Mattei's book on Vatican Council II throw it out.He has superficially read the Council and used the false premise like the liberals and the Vatican.If you have Taylor Marshall's book on Vatican Council II throw it out too.He has done the same. If you have any of Chris Ferrara's books on Vatican Council II throw them in the dust bin.
All three of them are refusing to interpret Vatican Council II without the false premise and then be labelled Feeneyites by the Left. -Lionel Andrades
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2019
Prof.Giovanni Tangorra teaches an Ecclesiology course at St.John Lateran University, Rome : He interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism to create a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition
SEPTEMBER 12, 2020
Don't buy any new book on Vatican Council II.Know that the author is intepreting Vatican Council II with the false premise.Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception to EENS, the Syllabus and Athanasius Creed.
Don't buy any new book on Vatican Council II.Know that the author is intepreting Vatican Council II with the false premise.Lumen Gentium 16 is not an exception to EENS, the Syllabus and Athanasius Creed. -Lionel Andrades
_____________________________
FEBRUARY 4, 2020
Write books
Write books. Write new books on Vatican Council II.Use the material from this blog.Permission is granted.No official permission is needed.Interpret Vatican Council II rationally.Everything else will follow in place.The Council supports Tradition.Get your premises and inferences straight. All will be well.
FEBRUARY 4, 2020
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Cardinal Ratzinger is a Cushingite and has interpreted the Nicene Creed with a false premise and inference which was not the understanding of the past centuries.Ignatius Press has published Credo for Today addressed to Christians and not Catholics. The Nicene Creed can be interpreted with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion would be different.
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Literal and objective errors mark Pope Benedict's books published by Ignatius Press.He has interpreted the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II irrationally
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Living the Catechism of the Catholic Church by Cardinal Schonborn (Ignatius) is inadequate. It has interpreted the Catechism irrationally with the Cushingite premise, inference and conclusion. The Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the Ratzinger theology.
FEBRUARY 2, 2020
Fr.Aidan Nicols Dominican Master of Sacred Theology has authored The Theology of Joseph Ratzinger (1988) and like the pope interprets Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion. This is a fault line in the books of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict pubished by Ignatius Press.Pope Benedict and Fr. Nicols need to stop promoting their books with the misinformation.
FEBRUARY 1, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to acknowledge that Pope Benedict, Aidan Nicols and so many of their authors have made an objective mistake
JANUARY 14, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to pull back Pope Benedict's book on ecclesiology since it was written with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html
JANUARY 21, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to stop publishing books on Vatican Council II by authors who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2, GS 22 etc as being exceptions to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Books written by Pope Benedict also carry this error https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-stop-publishing.html
FEBRUARY 1, 2020
Angelus Press of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational premise and inference and traditional conclusion.They have published another book with this error. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/angelus-press-of-society-of-st-pius-x.html
Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics ) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/attention-jesuits-before-you-write-new.html
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
FEBRUARY 1, 2020
Angelus Press of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise, inference and conclusion instead of the rational premise and inference and traditional conclusion.They have published another book with this error. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/02/angelus-press-of-society-of-st-pius-x.html
Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics ) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/attention-jesuits-before-you-write-new.html
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
At Oxford University 50 years after Vatican Council II they still do not have an insight into their collective error.Students at Oxford, thousands of them, did not think correctly and were going along with the masses, in their error. This centre of learning was in ignorance. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/at-oxford-university-england-professors.htmlNOVEMBER 11, 2019 The Oxford University Press has produced many books on Vatican Council II based upon a false premise. A deceptive rupture is created with Catholic Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-oxford-university-press-has.html OCTOBER 27, 2019Books on Vatican Council II should not receive the Imprimatur: authors interpret the Council with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/books-on-vatican-council-ii-should-not.html OCTOBER 15, 2019When you read Ludwig Ott's Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma or Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Roberto dei Mattei and John Hardon's books, be attentive.They accepted the Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) error. So their theology is off the rails.They had to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.This is a major theological error. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/when-you-read-ludwig-otts-fundamentals.htmlOCTOBER 11, 2019 Do not read these books : their new theololgy is the same as that of the Amazon Synod https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/do-not-read-these-books-their-new.html NOVEMBER 17, 2019NOVEMBER 16, 2019 Most of the books on Vatican Council II should not be there in the public and pontifical libraries . They should be sent back to the publishers if it is possible.They use a false premise and inference and then conclude with various new theories.Fr. Hans Kung sj is an example. So is Cardinal Walter Kasper.Their books should be removed from the libraries for being deceptive or the writers innocently being in ignorance. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/most-of-books-on-vatican-council-ii.html NOVEMBER 16, 2019 Clearer Vatican II vision by Paul Lakeland uses an outdated theology : the Catholic Church has moved forward https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/clearer-vatican-ii-vision-by-paul.html NOVEMBER 14, 2019 Fr.Hans Kung's books, which unethically use a false premise, to create a non traditional conclusion, are available at the Legion of Christ university, in Rome(UPRA) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/frhans-kungs-books-which-unethically.htmlNOVEMBER 12, 2019Gavin D'Costa's book published by the Oxford University Press has a philosophical and theological flaw https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/gavin-dcostas-book-published-by-oxford.htmlNOVEMBER 5, 2019 Before the Jesuits write new books on Vatican Council II someone has to inform them that LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only in 2019 and they are not real and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology, LG 16 and GS 22 are not practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and there is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/before-jesuits-write-new-books-on.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019Such a staggering thought.All those thousands of books, numerous, written on Vatican Council II have a major theological error. They should be thrown into the dustbin- O'Malley, Kasper, Faggioli,Gherardini,Mattei, Ferrara.They violate Newton's laws of physics and Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/such-staggering-thoughtall-those.htmlOCTOBER 28, 2019Repost : Books to avoid - Fenton and Hardon's theology is off the rails https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/repost-books-to-avoid-fenton-and.htmlAUGUST 25, 2019 Many Catholic books on salvation and Vatican Council II are written with irrational Cushingite philosophy and theology https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/many-catholic-books-on-salvation-and.html OCTOBER 28, 2019 All the books on Vatican Council II that have been published could probably have an error in the interpretation of the Council, in its 16 basic documents.Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate,Ad Gentes, Unitatitis Redintigratio, Gaudium et Specs etc were are all interpreted with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition. Hypotheticals were assumed to be objective people saved outside the Church. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-that.htmlOCTOBER 27, 2019 Books on Vatican Council II should not receive the Imprimatur: authors interpret the Council with a false premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/10/books-on-vatican-council-ii-should-not.html
OCTOBER 29, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment