SSPX's District Superior in Italy does not affirm the Catholic faith in public

 

KNOWLINGLY SUPPORTS ERROR

The District Superior of the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) at Albano, Italy once again at the Sunday Latin Mass at the SSPX chapel in Rome, yesterday at 11 a.m, did not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). The SSPX knowingly continues to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition. This is a scandal. The Superior is re-interpreting the Nicene Creed heretically, rejecting the Athanasius Creed and putting aside the traditional interpretation of the Catechisms. This is liberalism and a doctrinal mess. Don Louis Sentagne offered the Mass at the SSPX chapel near the Cavour Metro Station.

SERMON YESTERDAY

1.In his sermon he could have said that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They always refer to physically invisible cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14) and being saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) mentioned in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney (LOHO).

2.So LG 14 etc are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) of Pope Honorius III, who approved the religious community Order of Preachers of St. Dominic Guzman.

ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE DID NOT INTERPRET LG 8,14, 16 ETC RATIONALLY

3. Don Louis Sentagne could have said that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made a mistake when he accepted the 1949 LOHO with its objective error, confusing what is invisible as being visible. He interpreted Vatican Council II incorrectly.

4. Also the SSPX bishops and Don Davide Pagliarani, the Superior General of the SSPX are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally for political reasons and they have accepted the confusion and error of the 1949 LOHO, as did Pope Pius XII.

PIUS XII OVERLOOKED THR MISTAKE IN 1949 LOHO

Pius XII overlooked the mistake in the 1949 LOHO. This was after World War II and the creation of the state of Israel. So a New Theology came into the Church. It says outside the Church there is known salvation. This New Theology is based upon the false invisible- people- are- visible premise of the 1949 LOHO. The LOHO ( Letter of the Holy Office)  has been placed in the Denzinger and referenced in Vatican Council II (LG 16). The mistake was never corrected by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, as Prefect of the CDF. Otherwise he would have to affirm Feeneyite EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX.

SSPX PRIESTS AFRAID OF THE POLICE

I had mentioned in an earlier blog post that here in Rome the SSPX priests are afraid to affirm the dogma EENS in public and so they are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the liberals and the popes and cardinals. Since they want to protect their ‘careers’ as priests. The laity follows them. It is the same at the Vatican. - Lionel Andrades

https://fsspx.it/it/superiore-del-distretto