Proclaiming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is important in preaching, otherwise we are back to Vatican Council II (irrational), which separates Jesus from the Church by creating exceptions for the dogma EENS

 

The Catholic Church teaches that non Christians must convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (AG 7, LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc). This is the teaching of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. The norm for salvation is faith and baptism (AG 7, LG 14).While hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, are not objective exceptions for Ad Gentes 7. So the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church is the same before and after Vatican Council II. It is exclusivist on salvation and traditional on Mission and Outreach. All need to be members of the Catholic Church for  eternal bliss and adoration in Heaven.

We do not separate Jesus from the Catholic Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church. It is the Magisterium. This has been the teaching of the popes and saints over the centuries.

Vatican Council II (rational) has the hermeneutic of continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).

So in evangelization and mission we must not separate Jesus from the Church. The Church is the Mystical Body of Jesus and the Church is necessary for salvation. Membership in the Catholic Church does not mean equality with membership in Christian denominations. Their members are outside the Catholic Church.

If anyone is saved through the good things in other religions it will be known only to God. In Heaven they will be Catholic.

 Proclaiming exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is important in preaching, otherwise we are back to Vatican Council II (irrational), which separates Jesus from the Church by creating exceptions for the dogma EENS.- Lionel Andrades

_________________________________

SEPTEMBER 9, 2023

The discovery

 

The discovery

We have a discovery today. It’s ‘a small point’ but this small point turns the Council around. From liberalism the Council returns to Tradition. So by ignoring this small point, we have liberalism in the Church. This small point, is the premise: the rational and irrational premise. It decides if Vatican Council II has a continuity or break with Tradition. This is the discovery. We now have a switch. We can turn it off or on. We can choose a continuity with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors or a rupture with Tradition.   -Lionel Andrades

Lionel Andrades

former Staff Reporter, daily Morning News, Karachi, Pakistan.

Recipient of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award, presented by the Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto.

Recipient of the Pakistan Government's Award for Literature ( Childrens stories).

Teacher of English and Church History at the Catholic Minor Seminary, Rawalpindi.                                                                                                 

 

                                                            Bishop Anthony Lobo

Sent to Rome for Ministerial Priesthood by Bishop Anthony Lobo, bishop of Rawalpindi-Islamabad, Pakistan.

Discriminated against by the pontifical universities and seminaries in Rome.He interprets Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. So there is a continuity with Tradition. He is not allowed to study at pontifical universities in  Rome,  where it is obligatory to interpret Magisterial Documents, irrationally and unethically.Catholic students and seminarians are discriminated against. This is public and official.

However we have a new discovery in the Catholic Church. There are two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.How can the Holy Spirit make an objective mistake ? So it is human error and not the Magisterium.

 Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral, when it is interpreted rationally i.e LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases. So they are not objective examples of salvation. They are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed.

It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.The Creeds must not be changed.

Why should Catholics choose an irrational version of the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils, which is heretical, non-traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?

It is unethical when the popes, cardinals and bishops choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents and call it Catholic.

Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Murray, Balthazar, Kung, Lefebvre and Paul VI interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally. We can today choose to interpret the Council rationally and in harmony with Tradition.

Blog: http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/

Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)

E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com

Twitter : @LionelAndrades1

ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH      SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA