Roberto
dei Mattei interprets Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms irrationally
and not rationally. So he rejects the original understanding of the Creeds, he
is not in communion with Jesus and His Mystical Body the Church. There is no
denial from him or Correspondenza Romano, Radici Cristiane and the Lepanto
Foundation.
He
goes for the Latin Mass on Sunday in Rome and is given the Eucharist at the
church Santissima Trinita dei Pelligrini, Rome, of the Fraternity of St. Peter
(FSSP).
Changing
the interpretation of the Creeds, when there is a reference to the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.This is a mortal sin of faith. The Creeds are de
fide teachings that all Catholics have to accept. He also denys the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus which was defined by three Church Councils (Council
of Florence etc) which did not mention any exceptions.
I
accept Vatican Council II and all the Catechisms which I interpret only
rationally unlike him. I interpret them in harmony with the traditional
interpretation of the Creeds and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the rest of Tradition..
Pope
Francis is the pope for me. I am not a sedevacantist.
I
attend the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass in Rome.
Prof. Roberto dei Mattei, author, historian, a Catholic whom I respect, is unable to state:-
‘Lionel, I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
with no exceptions (Council of Florence 1442).
I
accept the Athanasius Creed with no exceptions.
I
accept Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 8,14,15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc being hypothetical cases. They refer to invisible
people in 2024.
‘For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church (847-848- invincible ignorance etc) does not contradict CCC 845-846(outside the Church there is no salvation).’- Lionel Andrades
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024
Admire St. Francis Xavier and quote him. But don't imitate him
Roberto dei Mattei cites St. Francis Xavier to criticize Pope Francis’ statement on all religions being paths to salvation. But Mattei too is politically correct with the Left, like the pope. He interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so does not have to affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Xavier and the Jesuit missionaries in the 16th century.
In his recent report, he implies that outside the Church there is no salvation, but he does not want to say it himself. It is only St. Francis Xavier who says it.
He reminds me of the sedevacantists Peter and Michael Dimond, who say outside the Church there is no salvation but then interpret Vatican Council II as a break and not continuity , with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Or, he reminds me of Michael Matt at the Remnant who kept saying, ‘Give us back our Tradition’- and when it is there for the asking, he does not want it. It would displease the SPLC and ADL.
John Henry Westen too does not want to go underground just yet and Archbishop Vigano too - is a rich man.
Probably Pope Francis issued that statement in Singapore, under the same pressure from the Left, which is there on Mattei, Matt, Westen and all the sedevacantists who are ready to oppose the pope but not the Zionists.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider has stated that the Vatican does not want to say Jesus is the only Savior of the world. True. But more relevant, the Vatican, like him, does not want to say that Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and an Athanasius Creed, with no exceptions. Instead, they are all accepting the objective mistake ( or political mistake) of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (CDF/DCF) to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center(LOHO).
At the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, the professors, like Ralph Martin, are told that they must accept the New Theology of the 1949 LOHO. It is obligatory. It was only, based upon alleged exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, that Bishop Robert Barron could tell Ben Shapiro that he did not need to enter the Church for salvation. It was based upon allegedly physically visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own and who are following their conscience ( Lumen Gentium 16) that extra ecclesiam nulla salus, could be made obsolete. And so the Jesuit Pope Francis could issue his Singapore heresy, contradicting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, changing the interpretation of the Nicene Creed, rejecting the Athanasius Creed, putting aside all the Catechisms including that of Pope John Paul II , rejecting traditional mission based upon there being exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church which is not contradicted with Vatican Council II, interpreted, rationally, i.e. Lumen Gentium 16 refers to invisible cases in 2024 etc, etc.
So is Roberto dei Mattei going to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus like St. Francis Xavier? No. He only admires the Jesuit priest. He cannot imitate him. - Lionel Andrades
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment