Now is the time for the SSPX to let us know their doctrinal beliefs which they profess before the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), privately. They could explain their position using the SBC model.

Brother Andre Marie's Doctrinal Belief's have been posted on the Catholicism.org website and the Society of St. Pius X( SSPX) who are having doctrinal talks with the Vatican could comment upon them.

They would agree with the Doctrinal Belief's of the St. Benedict Center but would interpret them with Cushingism instead of the Feeneyism of the SBC.

So a rupture with Tradition would be created on Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).The SSPX would reject the Council.They have been doing this all these years. They would put the blame on the Council when the cause of the problem is their Cushingite philosophy and theology.

The SSPX is not aware of the origin of the Cushingite passages in Vatican Council II.They read these passages as being against EENS ( Feeneyite) and the past popes.

Bishop Bernard Fellay had no concept of Cushingism and Feeneyism.He still does not understand it seems, what was the precise cause  of the New Theology, whose effects he could see.He himself interpreted UR 3, LG 8 etc as a rupture with EENS and then would blame the Council.

Now is the time for the SSPX  to let us know their doctrinal beliefs which they profess before the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), privately.

They could explain their position using the SBC model.

May be the SBC  members  who are in contact with the SSPX priests can get a statement from them.

-Lionel Andrades