All the books on Vatican Council II written by Pope Benedict which mention Vatican Council II are written with a false premise.He used a false premise to interpret the Council and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This has been reported so many times and there is no apology or acknowledgement of the error

 All the books on Vatican Council II written by Pope Benedict which mention Vatican Council II, are written with a false premise.He used a false premise to interpret the Council and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

This has been reported  so many times and there is no apology or acknowledgement of the error. -Lionel Andrades

SEPTEMBER 22, 2019

Cardinals and bishops at the Synods, under the influence of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They assumed hypothetical and unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc were objective examples of salvation outside the Church. So for them, like it was for Cardinal Ratzinger, the Syllabus of Errors had become obsolete. This is official modernism. The Oath Against Modernism is violated. Also the Oath of Office for religious and bishops, has become modernistic with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzingerhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinals-and-bishops-and-cardinals-at.html

 DECEMBER 16, 2019

Pope Benedict's article on ecclesiology is flawed since like Cardinal Kasper he projected what is hypothetical as being non hypothetical, invisible as visible, implicit as explicit and subjective as objective to create a rupture with Tradition and the past ecclesiology. The error is being followed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) . They too interpret Lumen Gentium as contradicting Tradition; the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors etc. So the Athanasius Creed is made obsolete and the Nicene Creed changed. Image result for Ecclesiology of Pope Benedict cardinal ratzinger They probably knew their theology and ecclesiology is flawed but continue with the error for political reasons. It is unethical and deceptive and not Catholic.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/pope-benedicts-article-on-ecclesiology.html

SEPTEMBER 21, 2019

The Church can be considered as a communion and a Sacrament and this does not exclude it being the only path to salvation. The Church may be considered a Mystery but this does not exclude it having an exclusiveness and superiority in salvation

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-church-can-be-considered-as.html

SEPTEMBER 21, 2019 

Pope Benedict refers to the Church as Communion, Sacrament, Mystery and this does not exclude the Church as being the only Ark of Noah ( CCC 845) with exclusive salvation.The Church still is the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood, it is the only Door to enter Heaven and it is the narrow gate. This is missing in Pope Benedict's ecclesiology of Vatican Council II  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/pope-benedict-refers-to-church-as.html

SEPTEMBER 20, 2019

Cardinal Marc Ouellet has interpreted Vatican Council II as an 'ecclesiology of communion' without exclusive salvation in the Church  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinal-marc-ouellet-has-interpreted.html 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2019 

Vatican website omits an important aspect of Church . International Theological Commission interprets the Council with heresy and schism  

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/vatican-website-omits-important-aspect.html

 SEPTEMBER 19, 2019

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the heretical New Theology and it wants the St.Benedict Center to do the same.Traditionalists at Una Voce(FIUV) and the Latin Mass Societies and organisations, are also forced to do likewise and there is no comment from them.Even the SSPX bishops and priests, use the New Theology to interpret the Council irrationally 

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-congregation-for-doctrine-of.html 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 

We can now interpret Vatican Council Ii without the New Theology.Lumen Gentium, in its entire text, for example,would not contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/we-can-now-interpret-vatican-council-ii.html

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/ecclesiology-of-vatican-ii-2069

SEPTEMBER 22, 2019

Cardinal Walter Kasper interprets Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases being objective . What is invisible is visible.What is implicit is confused as being explicit.He mixed up what is subjective as being objective.In this way a rupture with the old ecclesiology and the rest of Tradition, is created.His books on ecclesiology with this error are recommended reading at Ecclesiology semesters at the pontifical universities . They are approved by Pope Benedict and now Pope Francis. In an article on Ecclesiology, Cardinal Marc Oulett,uses Cardinal Kasper's books in the reference.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinal-walter-kasper-interprets.html

SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 Fr.Jean Marie Gleize, Fr.Matthias Gaudron,Fr. Francois Laisney and other priests and professors of theology of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) teach the same mistake in ecclesiology made by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, Cardinal Marc Ouelett,Cardinal Walter Kasper and Archbishop Rino Fisichella .Bishop Bernard Fellay is notorious    https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/frjean-marie-gleize-frmatthias.html

SEPTEMBER 23, 2019

A clarification needs to be issued by the Vatican https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/a-clarification-need-to-be-issued-by.html

SEPTEMBER 22, 2019  For Pope Benedict there is only a hermeneutic of rupture with Vatican Council II since he chooses to interpret the Council with the false premise and inference to change the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/for-pope-benedict-there-is-only.html 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2019 Cardinals and bishops at the Synods, under the influence of Cardinal Ratzinger/Pope Benedict rejected exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. They assumed hypothetical and unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc were objective examples of salvation outside the Church. So for them, like it was for Cardinal Ratzinger, the Syllabus of Errors had become obsolete. This is official modernism. The Oath Against Modernism is violated. Also the Oath of Office for religious and bishops, has become modernistic with the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/cardinals-and-bishops-and-cardinals-at.html 

 SEPTEMBER 22, 2019 THERE IS NO UNITY WITH THE APOSTLES SINCE CARDINAL RATZINGER REJECTS EXCLUSIVE SALVATION IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH  HTTPS://EUCHARISTANDMISSION.BLOGSPOT.COM/2019/09/THERE-IS-NO-UNITY-WITH-APOSTLES-SINCE.HTML 

 SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

Pope Benedict made an error in ecclesiology and the New Catechumenal Way of Kiko Arguello have been following it at their seminaries https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/pope-benedict-made-error-in.html

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019

The theology of religions banned by Pope John Paul II(CDF,Notification, Dupuis, 2001) is being taught by Fr. Bryan Lobo sj, at the Department of Missiology of the Pontifical University Gregorian. He also interprets Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to intentionally create a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and Tradition

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/the-theology-of-religions-which-was.html

 

MAY 24, 2019

Pope Benedict and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria supported a theology of religions ! This is heresy  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/pope-benedict-and-cardinal-luiz-ladaria.html

_____________________