Gerard O’Connell writing in the Jesuit magazine America, has not
clarified that Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano has to interpret Vatican Council
II irrationally and not rationally, otherwise he will face charges of schism or
be excommunicated.
Neither has this been denied by Msgr. John Kennedy, secretary of the
Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, which is officially interpreting
the Council with a fake premise to produce a rupture with Catholic Tradition. 1
How can Msgr. Kennedy and Cardinal Fernandez be in communion with the
Church when they interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and
inference and do not deny it.2
According to Canon Law Cardinal Fernandez would be in schism when he
interprets Vatican Council II ( LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS etc) as physically
visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and so practical
exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Council of Florence
1442).3
Fernandez also accepts the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the
Archbishop of Boston (LOHO). It confused invisible cases of the baptism of
desire as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
So the interpretation of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed has
been changed.This is first class heresy according to Ad Tuendem Fidem of Pope John Paul II. So my interpretation of Vatican Council II with the rational premise has a different conclusion. My interpretation of the Creeds with the rational premise also has a traditional conclusion.Msgr. Kennedy cannot say the same.- Lionel Andrades
1
The decree is dated June 11 and is signed by Msgr.
John Kennedy, secretary of the doctrinal office's disciplinary section,
requesting that Viganò present himself on June 20 at 15:30 to formally receive
the accusation and evidence against him.
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2024/06/24/vigano-schism-response-trial-248207
2
On June 20, the
archbishop posted on his own website a two-page decree from
the Vatican's Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith ordering him to appear
for a trial regarding "public statements that show a denial of points
necessary for the preservation of communion with the Catholic Church."
https://www.ncronline.org/vatican/vatican-news/archbishop-vigan-says-he-faces-schism-charges-vaticans-doctrinal-office
3.
According to the
church's Code of Canon Law, the charge of schism is punishable by
excommunication.
NICENE CREED
We believe in one God,
the Father, the Almighty,
maker of heaven and earth,
of all that is seen and unseen.
We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ,
the only Son of God,
eternally begotten of the Father,
God from God, Light from Light,
true God from true God,
begotten, not made, one in Being with the Father.
Through him all things were made.
For us men and for our salvation
he came down from heaven:
by the power of the Holy Spirit
he was born of the Virgin Mary, and became man.
For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,
he suffered, died, and was buried.
On the third day he rose again
in fulfillment of the Scriptures;
he ascended into heaven
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead,
and his kingdom will have no end.
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
who proceeds from the Father and the Son.
With the Father and the Son he is worshiped and glorified.
He has spoken through the Prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.
We look for the resurrection of the dead
and the life of the world to come. Amen.
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2016
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-vatican-curia-interprets-nicene.html
But if there are exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) then the Nicene Creed is saying 1) there are three or more baptisms, 2) they are physically visible for them to be exceptions for EENS, and 3) they exclude the baptism of water and so are practical exceptions for EENS. 4) So EENS is obsolete since there are known exceptions
The Vatican Curia interprets the Nicene Creed with irrational Cushingism : 'I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins.' When the Creed is interpreted with Cushingism the result is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truth of Pope John Paul II.
4.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Rational Premise
Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Lumen Gentium 14 and Lumen Gentium 16 in Vatican Council II refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2021.They are only hypothetical and theoretical. They exist only in our mind and are not solid bodies at Newton's level of time, space and matter.
Rational Inference
They are not objective examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings.
Rational Conclusion
Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS as it was interpreted by the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.It does not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS of St. Thomas Aquinas( saved in invincible ignorance is invisible), St. Augustine and Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
The Letter of the Holy Office(Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) 1949 made an objective mistake.-L.A
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/05/in-italy-national-catechetical-centers.html
Pope Francis and Pope Benedict's interpretation of the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( CCC 846, 1257) are non magisterial since they use a false premise to interpret CCC 846 (Outside the Church No Salvation) and CCC 1257 ( The Necessity of Baptism ).They have a rational and traditional choice which they avoid https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/04/pope-francis-and-pope-benedicts.html
______________________________________
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment