Vatican Council II has become an issue.The popes, cardinals, bishops and priests use an irrational version of the Council and this can be checked,legally or otherwise, any time and any where.
So when the media, secular and Church, accept manuscripts /articles based on the irrational interpretation of the Council, this can be prohibited.It is unethical and deceptive.
So when the media, secular and Church, accept manuscripts /articles based on the irrational interpretation of the Council, this can be prohibited.It is unethical and deceptive.
When an organization persists with the irregularity then the motive is suspect.
All the Vatican and secular organizations/websites can choose to interpret the Council rationally and honestly ,instead of the present approach, which uses a fake premise and inference to create a false rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc).
So the bishops conferences e.g Poland etc, can switch to a rational interpretation of the Council and replace the present obsolete, liberal version. The Council is not rejected.It is read in a different way.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/oxford-university-press-must-inform.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-in-st.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/dominican-master-general-is-in-rupture.html
January 14, 2020
Attention Jesuits : Before you write new books on Vatican Council II please do not make this mistake ( Graphics )
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/attention-jesuits-before-you-write-new.html
JANUARY 14, 2020
Oxford University Press must inform authors not to send manuscripts ; pull back Gavin D'Costa's book on Vatican Council IIhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/oxford-university-press-must-inform.html
JANUARY 14, 2020
All the books on Vatican Council II in the St. John Lateran University , Rome library are written with a false premise and need to be thrown out.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/all-books-on-vatican-council-ii-in-st.html
JANUARY 14, 2020
Ignatius Press needs to pull back Pope Benedict's book on ecclesiology since it was written with a false interpretation of Vatican Council II.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/ignatius-press-needs-to-pull-back-pope.html
JANUARY 13, 2020
Professors at the St.John Lateran University, Rome know that Vatican Council II does not contradict the old Jesuit interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but they do not teach it to the students. So they keep their teaching jobs at the pontifical university.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-professors-at-stjohn-lateran.htmlJANUARY 13, 2020
Pope Paul VI was fallible on faith.He also made a mistake on an infallible teaching of the Church, with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.He avoided the rational alternative. All the popes upto Francis have repeated the same mistake.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/pope-paul-vi-was-fallible-on-faithhe.htmlJANUARY 12, 2020
Dominican Master General is in a rupture with past Dominicans with his irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II : false message in EWTN interviewhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/dominican-master-general-is-in-rupture.html
JANUARY 11, 2020
The professors Tangorra, Fuss,Chenaux, Nardin,Ciola, Zak and Ferri tell students at the St. John Lateran University Rome to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and Pope Francis and Pope Benedict approve it. Otherwise the Council would support the past ecclesiology, the Syllabus of Errors of Pius IX and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and this would not be approved by the Left, which represents Satan
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-professors-tangorra-fusschenaux.htmlJANUARY 7, 2020
Fr.Francesco Giordano and Prof. Sandra Mazzolini's theology is political and they suggest it is from the Holy Spirit
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/frfrancesco-giordano-and-prof-sandra.htmlJANUARY 7, 2020
The Wikipedia entries on the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney is leftist propaganda.It pre-supposes that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to visible and known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It also pre-supposes that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ known salvation outside the Church where the true Church subsists), Lumen Gentium 16 etc, are known non Cathlics saved outside the Church.Upon this error they have created a rupture with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-wikipedia-entries-on-slaves-of.htmlJANUARY 4, 2020
Rector needs to clarify this issue for Maronites all over the world.JANUARY 4, 2020
The Handook of Studies of the Urbaniana Pontifical University, Rome ( Ordo) shows like the Handook of Studies of the Angelicum University Rome ( 2019-2020) that Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally to create a rupture with traditional mission doctrine, the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, an ecumenism of return and extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the miissionaries in the 16th century
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-handook-of-studies-of-urbaniana.htmlJANUARY 2, 2020
The USCCB: The Nicene Creed is professed at all Sunday Masses and Solemnities within the Catholic Church. True but the meaning has been changed after the Fr. Leonard Feeney Case
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-usccb-nicene-creed-is-professed-at.htmlNOVEMBER 26, 2019
Paul Lakeland agrees that his interpretation of Vatican Council II was irrational and artificial : it was a false rupture with Tradition. He teaches a false theology at the University of Fairfield, Ohio
DECEMBER 5, 2019
Paul Lakeland - how to be sincere and teach ecclesiology with integrity would be an issue today https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/paul-lakeland-how-to-be-sincere-and.html
The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting reviews of books on Vatican Council II, in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics )
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The
National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj
and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors
made a mistake ( Graphics) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The
National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj
and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors
made a mistake ( Graphics) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The
National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj
and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors
had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with
false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council
superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective
exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational.
So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents
of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture
with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporters-reviews.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Massimo
Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational
interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had
two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the
superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland
and Fr. Jared Wicks sj. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019 Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-and-massimo.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
The
National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj
and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors
had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with
false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council
superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective
exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational.
So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents
of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture
with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporters-reviews.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Massimo
Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational
interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had
two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the
superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland
and Fr. Jared Wicks sj. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
Massimo
Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational
interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had
two books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the
superficial and false reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland
and Fr. Jared Wicks sj. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019 Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-and-massimo.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
Pope
Francis needs to tell Eugenio Scalfari that articles and reports in his
newspaper on Vatican Council II have a built-in error : Andrea
Tornielli needs to clean up the Vatican websites which carry the same
mistake https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/pope-francis-needs-to-tell-eugenio.html
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
________________________
NOVEMBER 17, 2019
________________________
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted by them with false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council superficially.Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church. This is irrational.
So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents of the NCR were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation etc.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporters-reviews.html
DECEMBER 5, 2019
The autumn general assembly of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Baltimore Nov. 13, 2019, did not discuss how Vatican Council II can be interpreted in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) - and Massimo Faggioli has no comment on this.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/the-autumn-general-assembly-of-us.html
NOVEMBER 4, 2019
NOVEMBER 4, 2019
So Massimo Faggioli can no more interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabusof Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/so-massimo-faggioli-can-no-more.html
SEPTEMBER 2, 2019
LifeSitesNews
could explain to Michael Sean Winters how doctrinally and theologically
they are not in schism : they affirm Vatican Council II and other
magisterial documents without the false premise https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/lifesitesnews-could-explain-to-michael.html
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible.
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The
unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but
dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.
With
the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are
visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed,
there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over
the centuries referred to only one known baptism, the baptism of
water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the
baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or
more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and
ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic
Church'.
3. The
Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic
Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit
guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation
outside the Church.Now unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism
of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of
salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for
Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with
their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican
Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted
with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite),
the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With
the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It
affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible
ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics
saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a
hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris
Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration etc were
all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive
salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted
EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past
ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without
the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the
necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional
mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is
rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the
Church.
9.Inter
faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more
adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the
Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is
assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case
of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new
heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The
Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the
Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
LifeSitesNews
could explain to Michael Sean Winters how doctrinally and theologically
they are not in schism : they affirm Vatican Council II and other
magisterial documents without the false premise https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/09/lifesitesnews-could-explain-to-michael.html
With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible.
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The
unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but
dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.
With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over
the centuries referred to only one known baptism, the baptism of
water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the
baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or
more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and
ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic
Church'.
3. The
Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic
Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit
guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation
outside the Church.Now unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism
of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2,
GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of
salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)
in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for
Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with
their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With
the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It
affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible
ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics
saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a
hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris
Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration etc were
all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive
salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted
EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past
ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without
the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the
necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
AUGUST 24, 2019
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment