Even Pope Francis returns to Tradition when he interprets Vatican Council II rationally. All the cardinals return to Tradition when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

 

MARCH 1, 2023

Even Pope Francis returns to Tradition when he interprets Vatican Council II rationally. All the cardinals return to Tradition when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

 

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre did not know about the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and he thought that the Novus Ordo Mass was responsible for the new liberalism in the Church. All he had to do was not interpret the Council with the Fake Premise, which came from the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. Then the Church in 1965 would have returned to Tradition. He could have corrected the error of Pope Paul VI and the Masons.

Even today the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) chooses the Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and they do not even deny it.

The Masons want the New Missal which is based upon the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II of the SSPX- and the popes.

This liberal interpretation of the Council eliminates the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. When the Fake Premise is chosen there has to be first class heresy and schism with the past Magisterium. This is irrespective if the person choosing it is a liberal or a conservative.

It is with one step that liberalism is created. A false premise is chosen.

It is with one step that the Church returns to Tradition. It has to choose, once again, the rational premise.

The way to return to Tradition is to simply interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as only hypothetical cases in 1965-2023.So LG 8 etc are not practical and observable examples of salvation outside the Church in the present times. They are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS and the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.

The Council is then legitimate, rational and traditional.

Now for the popes it is legitimate, irrational and nontraditional.

For some of the traditionalists it could be illegitimate, since it is irrational, nontraditional and heretical.'How can a pope support a heretical Council ?', ask, the sedevacantists.

The SSPX must no more be labeled traditionalist. It implies that they are traditionalist since they choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and not accept either of the two. That description is finished with the discovery of the rational and irrational premise. The Rational Premise ends the liberal-traditionalist division. There is no more any liberalism.Since with the Rational Premise even those who attend the Novus Ordo Mass support Tradition, like the SSPX. They have to support Tradition with the Rational Premise. There is no other choice.

Even Pope Francis returns to Tradition when he interprets Vatican Council II rationally. All the cardinals return to Tradition when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally.

All the cardinals affirm the ecclesiology of the old Roman Missal when they interpret the Council without the False Premise.

The SSPX must ask Pope Francis to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc rationally and so return to Tradition like them.- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/even-pope-francis-returns-to-tradition.html