Profession of Faith, Oath Against Modernism are meaningless : Vatican Council's interpretation creates orthodoxy or heresy, modernism or faithfulness to the Catholic faith

The Profession of Faith is useless today. The Oath Against Modernism is meaningless.Instead Catholics should be asked how do they interpret Vatican Council II. How do they interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II ? Are they invisible or visible, implicit or explicit, subjective or objective,hypothetical or real, for you ?. This decides it.It decides if we are faithful or modernist, orthodox or unorthodox.It decides if we really are Catholic or heretical.One interpretation is rational and the other irrational.
 

We can interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and recite the Creed.The result is heresy.The irrational interpretation creates modernism. The Catholic becomes a liberal.
 

A Catholic could recite the Nicene Creed.Then he could interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc,irrationally. LG 8 etc would refer to personally known non Catholics.


People  saved outside the Church.This creates confusion.The Council becomes a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors.The Athanasius Creed is made obsolete.We have a new interpretation of the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed.
 

If LG 8,LG 14, LG 16 etc refer to visible non Catholics outside the Church then outside the Church there is salvation.So LG 16( invincible ignorance) becomes an exception to magisterial documents. The Catechism of Pope Pius X is contradicted.It is contradicted on outside the Church there is no salvation. This Catechism would also contradict itself.
 
 So recite the Nicene Creed as a Profession of Faith.However also ask,"Does LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to physically invisible or visible cases for you ?".
The difference needs to be clarified. There then is a profession of orthodoxy or heresy.-Lionel Andrades