Monday, June 26, 2023

Tyler, Texas


NO NON APOSTOLIC VISITATION MUST BE ALLOWED

Jesse Romero and John Henry Weston must not allow a   non apostolic visitation by bishops to Tyler, Texas and other dioceses. The Vatican and the USCCB are deceptive on Vatican Council II . This is public. No future bishop must be allowed at Tyler, Texas who forces a non magisterial  interpretation of Creeds and Councils,  on the diocese. A bishop who interprets Vatican Council II with the invisible-people-are-visible fantasy premise is automatically disqualified. He must be told to go back.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/sister-maria-philomena-micm-goes-for.html


https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/staugustine-institute-of-wisdom-sai.html


FAKE INSPECTOR BISHOPS

An inspector-bishop who interprets Vatican Council II with the common fake premise, inference and non-traditional conclusion is a liar.

Catholics in Texas must set a standard for the interpretation of Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms.

The Vatican’s Dicastery for Bishops Visitation is ‘un-apostolic’ when they dictate a fake interpretation of all Church Documents. So they change the understanding of the Councils, Creeds and Catechisms and call it Catholic.

Tyler, must ask the Vatican and the USCCB to only send bishops, who are honest. If they are dishonest and pulling a fast one, it is not legal.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/blog-post.html



BISHOPS FOLLOW THE LOHO MISTAKE

It may be mentioned, in background information, that Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston was interpreting the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) rationally like the Council of Florence (1442) and the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which did not mention any exceptions for EENS.He was also interpreting the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I), rationally, as not being physically visible in our human reality (Bread of Life by Fr. Leonard Feeney).The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO) to the Archbishop of Boston, a political letter, interpreted invisible cases of the BOD and I.I as being visible exceptions for the dogma EENS.This was the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican making an objective mistake, officially. They  slandered the St. Benedict Center and Fr. Leonard Feeney. Pope Francis, the USCCB and the ADL supported the irrational 1949 Letter as did the popes from Pius XII. The popes did not ask how could invisible people on earth who are now in Heaven also be visible on earth and be visible exceptions for EENS ?  How could they be in two places at the same time, contradicting the Principle of Non Contradiction of Aristotle?





Yet this is the reasoning of the 1949 Letter (LOHO) and its New Theology is accepted by Pope Francis, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Congregation for Bishops.


BISHOPS VIOLATE PRINCIPLE OF NON CONTRADICTION

Bishop Gerald Kicanus and Bishop Dennis Sullivan who reportedly led the Vatican-check at Tyler, Texas, interpret Vatican Council II with the mistake of the LOHO. They violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. This is dishonest. It is not Catholic and not canonical.

 


 If the bishops interpret all Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils etc) rationally then it would be apostolic and magisterial. A papal delegate or even a nuncio has to be Catholic according to Canon Law. According to secular law they must not lie and deceive the people.

BISHOP DANIEL FERNANDEZ TORRES

Bishop Daniel Fernandez Torres of the Diocese of Arecibo in Puerto Rico was the subject of a Vatican-check by Cardinal Blasé Cupich. It is reported that among other things he would not send his seminarians to the national seminary. At that seminary they would be interpreting Vatican Council II with the invisible people are visible premise. Cardinal Cupich chooses this deception and considers it magisterial.

BISHOP ROGELLO LIVIERES PLANO

In Paraguay, Bishop Rogello Livieres Plano was removed from the Diocese of Ciudad de Este in 2014 after a non apostolic visitation. The visitors, not in good standing with the pre-1949 Magisterium of the Catholic Church,  claimed he lacked collegiality. He had to follow the rest of the liberal Church approved by the Vatican.They have no theological foundation in Vatican Council II (rational).



BISHOP DOMINIQUE REY

This year the Dicastery of Bishops sent visitors who did not affirm Vatican Council II rationally to the diocese of Toulon-Frejus, France. If they 'imprudently' interpreted Vatican Council II honestly they would emerge as traditionalists, like Dom Alcuin Reid. Bishop Dominique Rey did not make it a condition that only those French bishops, come there and inspect the seminary, who interpret the Council rationally and so support Tradition.



FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE IMMACULATE

There was also a visitation of the battle-weary Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate in Italy. The visiting nun was a liberal hit-woman, who interpreted the Council fai da te ( do it yourself, as you like) to avoid accusations of being a closet Feeneyite. Pope Francis himself interprets Vatican Council II prudently and irrationally to not seem ‘rigid’. He wants the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate to do the same if they want their seminary back.


CARDINAL RAINER WOELKI

The German Cardinal Rainer Woelki passed the liberal visitation check. He interprets the Council irrationally and unethically like the rest of the German bishops,the CDF and Cardinal Muller.

Within the Catholic Church we now have a renegade and rebel Church. This is New Church.They  re-interpret all Church Documents as they like.This has to be checked. The bishops acts as if they canchoose what they want, like at McDonalds, when they inspect doctrine and theology in a diocese.This is an un-apostolic visitation and is not Magisterial. -Lionel Andrades

 https://catholicmasses.org/reports-vatican-ordered-investigation-targets-bishop-strickland-of-tyler-texas/










JUNE 22, 2023

Even Pope Francis returns to Tradition when he interprets Vatican Council II rationally. All the cardinals return to Tradition when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/even-pope-francis-returns-to-tradition.html

 

 JUNE 22, 2023

These are Church Documents which Pope Francis does not affirm. He believes Vatican Council II (irrational) contradicts them and they are obsolete now

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/these-are-church-documents-which-pope.html

 

 

JUNE 22, 2023

Canonically he does not qualify to be a pope. Since even a Rector and Parish Priest, according to Canon Law, has to be a Catholic in public. He must affirm the teachings of the Catholic Church in public

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/canonically-he-does-not-qualify-to-be.html

 


 


JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis simply has to interpret the BOD, BOB and I.I as not being exceptions to EENS : heresy and sacrilege end (Graphics )

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-simply-has-to-interpret.html

  

JUNE 22, 2023

A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/a-pope-cannot-be-magisterial-who.html

 

 JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis supports the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Rector of Boston College and the American Jesuits. This is not Magisterial. Heresy and schism are not Magisterial.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-supports-boston-heresy-of.html

 

 

 JUNE 22, 2023

It cannot be said, ‘to follow Pope Francis is to follow the Magisterium’ since Pope Francis rejects the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence, Cantata Domino (1442) and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX when he accepts and interprets Vatican Council II irrationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/it-cannot-be-said-to-follow-pope.html

 


 




JUNE 22, 2023

If Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II rationally, he will be forced to accept Tradition like the Franciscans of the Immaculate. As Catholics learn that they have a choice- they can interpret the Council rationally, priests and bishops will, do the same. Future cardinals will only be able to interpret the Council

rationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/if-pope-francis-interprets-vatican_22.html

 

 

JUNE 22, 2023

I accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church which I interpret rationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/i-accept-vatican-council-ii-and.html

 

 

JUNE 22, 2023

How can Pope Francis offer Holy Mass,he does not affirm the Nicene and Athanasius Creed in the original and traditional meaning ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/how-can-pope-francis-offer-holy-masshe.html


JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis cannot be apostolic or magisterial when he chooses the fake premie which I and others avoid in the interpretation of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-must-not-refer-to-his_22.html

 

 JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis and my interpretation of the Creeds is different.Priests do not say that I am wrong.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-and-my-interpretation-of_22.html

 

JUNE 22, 2023

The popes, cardinals and bishops are not apostolic on the Creeds, since they interpret them irrationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/the-popes-cardinals-and-bishops-are-not_22.html

 



JUNE 22, 2023

CDF is not magisterial on Vatican Council II. This is not the Magisterium. The Magisterium would interpret Vatican Council II rationally, ethically, traditionally and so non schismatically

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/cdf-is-not-magisterial-on-vatican.html

 

JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis must interpret Vatican Council II with the red not being an exception for the blue i.e. the red hypothetical passages are not practical exceptions for the orthodox blue passages which are in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).This is the rational and honest interpretation of the Council. There is no other alternative.

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-must-interpret-vatican.html

JUNE 22, 2023

Ruth Graham at the New York Times and Nicole Winfield and Trisha Thomas of the Associated Press in Rome, are still interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. It is as if they have a political obligation to be unethical and dishonest.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/ruth-graham-at-new-york-times-and.html

JUNE 22, 2023

Why should all the cardinals and bishops interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms like cardinals Hollerich and Grech and Pope Francis and not like me? They have an obligation to be honest.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/why-should-all-cardinals-and-bishops.html


 





JUNE 22, 2023

This is not Magisterial.They are interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally.They are choosing the false premise and inference to create a fake break with Tradition. This is a mortal sin since the Creeds are changed.Cardinals Grech and Hollerich cease to be cardinals until the scandal is ended. This press conference is political and not Catholic. This is a fake Gospel and not traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Jesus and the Bible judge.Jesus tells us people go to Hell..

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/this-is-not-magisterialthey-are.html

 

JUNE 21, 2023

Jules Gomes, Gaven Ashden, Bradley Eli, Diane Montagna and others do not discuss this issue to protect their self interests, their finances, careers etc. If Diane Montage called attention to this issue at the Press Conference with Cardinal Grech he could ask her if she interpreted Vatican Council II rationally and she could answer 'no'.If she said 'yes' she would lose her press credentials

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/jules-gomes-gaven-ashden-bradley-eli.html

 

 JUNE 21, 2023

Pope Francis, Cardinal Gianfranco Ghirlanda sj, the former Commissar for the FFI and Cardinal Ladaria are saying that there are visible cases of LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3,NA 2, GS 22 etc. This is unethical. It is not Catholic. They are forcing the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Comitato dell Immaculata to accept this dishonesty in exchange, for the canonical recognition of the FFI, freedom for the Third Order and the re-opening of the Terra Santa seminary and old church. This is coercion.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/incomplete-franciscans-of-immaculate-fr.html

 

JUNE 19, 2023

SSPX's District Superior in Italy does not affirm the Catholic faith in public

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/sspxs-district-superior-in-italy-does.html


 

JUNE 19, 2023

SSPX's District Superior in Italy does not affirm the Catholic faith in public

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/sspxs-district-superior-in-italy-does.html

 








 JUNE 4, 2023

We do not have unity on the Creeds in the Catholic Church.Liberalism no more has any theological basis in the Vatican Council II-text

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/we-do-not-have-unity-on-creeds-in.html

 



 

 JUNE 4, 2023

Invisible people cannot be exceptions for EENS. For me LG 8 etc refer to invisible cases. For Pope Francis, the cardinals, bishops and the SSPX they refer to visible cases. If they were invisible cases for them , then they would be Feeneyites. But they deny this. They deny that their interpretation of the baptism of desire (LG 14) etc is Feeneyite.So they imply that LG 8 etc refer to visible cases and so LG 8 etc are exceptions for EENS . This is Cushingism.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/invisible-people-cannot-be-exceptions.html

 

JUNE 3, 2023

The Judge in the De Laire-Voris case in New Hampshire would be interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally since this is a common error. This would be unethical. If he interprets the Council rationally he will become a Feeneyite like the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, NH

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/the-judge-in-de-laire-voris-case-in-new.html

JUNE 1, 2023

Judiciary in New Hampshire must be honest

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/judiciary-in-new-hampshire-must-be.html




https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/news-media-must-accept-vatican-council.html

________________________________________








JULY 10, 2017

Fort Worth Latin Mass community ask Bishop Olson not to give dispensations in inter faith marriages based on Vatican Council II ( Cushingism) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/07/fort-worth-latin-mass-community-ask.html



Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Catholic lay man in Rome,
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )







-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/03/there-are-two-interpretations-of-nicene.html









FALSE PREMISE DEFINED 
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible.
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking  who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.


 With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred  to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.
3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now  unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.

4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration  etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/08/cardinal-reinhold-marx-of-munich.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2021/10/with-irrational-premise-nicene-creed-is.html   
_____________________________________________________________



























JUNE 22, 2023

The Principle of Non Contradiction also applies to a pope. They too must follow Newton's Laws of Physics

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/the-principle-of-non-contradiction-also.html

 

 

JUNE 22, 2023

A pope who changes the interpretation of the Creeds in the name of Vatican Council II which he does not interpret rationally is in mortal sin ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/a-pope-who-changes-interpretation-of.html

JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis is in heresy. He must affirm the Catholic Faith in public.Vatican Council II is the issue.The Council can be interpreted rationally. It then does not contradict Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-is-in-heresy-he-must.html

 

JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez want the Franciscans of the Immaculate to accept Vatican Council II (irrational). They refuse .They are correct. Why should they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-and-cardinal-braz-de-avez.html

 

 

JUNE 22, 2023

Pope Francis was not apostolic when he closed down the Terra Santa seminary of the Franciscans of the Immaculate in Boccea, Rome and the Holy Mother of God seminary, San Rafael, Mendoza, Argentina. He was interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. He made a mistake on Vatican Council II.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/06/pope-francis-was-not-apostolic-when-he.html




















No comments: