VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY'S JOURNAL AMERICAN CATHOLIC STUDIES' COVER STORY TO CONTAIN FACTUAL ERRORS AND STEREOTYPE POLITICAL PROPAGANDA

American Catholic Studies journal to claim we can know people in Heaven saved in invincible ignorance and  the baptism of desire.

The report will also be hiding a fact: that it was Cardinal Richard Cushing  who considered the baptism of desire etc as explicit exceptions to the dogma and this is heresy.

By publishing this report Villanova University will be saying :

1) we can know of cases of non Catholics saved in invincible  ignorance etc in Heaven.

2) The Faculty and students have the capability to discern and identify these extra ordinary cases.

These are factual statements being made by the University.One does not need a University degree to know that this is a lie and touching the absurd and hilarious.

This is a falsehood. We humans do not know any such cases.

So it will be an error to consider Fr.Leonard  Feeney wrong for

1) denying the baptism of desire being an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

and

2) assuming that there is no such thing as a baptism of desire.Since whether he assumed it or not( that there was a baptism of desire) is irrelevant to the literal interpretation of the dogma outside the church no salvation.

-Lionel Andrades

Caption: Photo of the Vice President at Villanova University

________________________________________

The following is the e-mail message I sent  yesterday night to Leigh Anne McCabe after receiving her e-mail enquiring about photographs of Fr.Leonard Feeney.

_________________________________________

Dear LeighAnne McCabe,

Praised be Jesus and Our Lady.

I have been monitoring this issue for sometime, so even before you publish your cover story I am sure it will contain these factual errors.

1.The report assumes that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This is false we do not know any of these cases personally.

2. The report assumes that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 criticized Fr.Leonard Feeney for rejecting the baptism of desire etc. If they did they made a mistake, an objective error. The baptism of desire etc is not relevant to the dogma.

3. The report will be a calumny of Fr.Leonard Feeney since you will assume that he was excommunicated for denying the baptism of desire etc and so he is a heretic.

4. You will also be calling popes, Church Councils, saints and Church Fathers heretics for holding the same position as Fr.Leonard Feeney i.e the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

I can assure you that these will be the factual errors in your coming report.

In Christ

Mr.Lionel Andrades

p.s I do not have any special photos of Fr.Leonard Feeney. Perhaps you could contact one of his religious communities in the USA. The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary hold the same view as Fr.Leonard Feeney on this issue and Villanova University would be calling all of them heretics. Some of these communitied have been granted full canonical status by the Catholic Church.

You can ask at Catholicism.org

_________________________________________________

Sunday, May 6, 2012 

American Catholic Studies is to publish a cover essay entitled "American Heretic: The Rise and Fall of Father Feeney"
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/05/american-catholic-studies-is-to-publish.html#links

AT VILLANOVA CAN THEY SEE PEOPLE IN HEAVEN?