Monday, December 30, 2019

Lefebvrist studies at pontifical university

A young man who attends the Latin Mass at the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) chapel in Rome told me he was studing  theology at a pontifical university in Rome.He was familiar with the SSPX position on Vatican Council II.He did not know the difference between Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite.
The books of Paulo Pasqualucci and the SSPX writers on Vatican Council II are available at the chapel.
He had no problem in being admitted as a lay student  in a pontifical university. SInce he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not Feeneyism.The pontifical universities only permit the Council to be interpreted with Cushingism.The SSPX and the professors at the pontifical universities interpret Vatican Council II with the same Cushingism. The SSPX rejects the conclusion and the professors accept it.
So for the SSPX, Vatican Council II is a rupture with Tradition and the for the professors at the pontifical univerisities it is not.
The professors are deceptive. Since Vatican Council II , Cushngite, has to be a rupture with the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
I attend Holy Mass in Italian but I am not allowed to study at a pontifical university since I affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise. So I am left with Vatican Council II, Feeneyite.
The liberals will be ready to accept the dogma of the Immaculate Conception but not the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, since Vatican Council II , Cushingite, is an obvious rupture.
So the young man who leads the rosary at the SSPX chapel before the morning Sunday Mass in Latin, would be looked down upon at the university for not accepting the Council(Cushingite).But he would be admitted all the same, just like a non Christian student.
  However for a Messianic Jew or Catholic Feeneyite there would be trouble. The Leftist racist laws are not applied here.
A Catholic Feeneyite has to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, to get admission in a pontifical university.
To be admitted in a pontifical university a Catholic has to affirm Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(Cushingite).
The university then issues an academic degree which is necessary to teach Catechism etc, 'with the error'.-Lionel Andrades






DECEMBER 5, 2019



Paul Lakeland - how to be sincere and teach ecclesiology with integrity would be an issue today.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/paul-lakeland-how-to-be-sincere-and.html

NOVEMBER 20, 2019




The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting reviews of books on Vatican Council II, in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics )

NOVEMBER 20, 2019



 NOVEMBER 20, 2019

The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors made a mistake ( Graphics) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html

_________________________________________
NOVEMBER 17, 2019

DECEMBER 5, 2019 

Will Michael Sean Winters now drop the usual name-dropping on Vatican Council II ?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/will-michael-sean-winters-now-drop.html


DECEMBER 5, 2019



An educated , articulate and caring nun dies in ignorance of Vatican Council II : Sr.Carmel McEnroy,83

NOVEMBER 30, 2019


I affirm the Athanasius Creed and Vatican Council II

NOVEMBER 28, 2019



Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not tell the person who wants to leave the Church , that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and all those outside are on the way to Hell.

Posted by at No comments:

Angelicum Dean of Theology un-ethical : no denial or clarification from her

It's unethical for the Dean of Theology at the Angelicum to claim unknown cases mentioned in Lumen Gentium and Unitatis Redintigratio  are known exceptons to the past ecclesiology  and ecumenism of return and 16th century outside the Church there is no salvation.
She may be compelled to say this by her Superiors but finally she is the one who gives talks on truth and beauty in the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas and the beauty of marriage etc.
She kneels before the Blessed Sacrament Exposed through out the day at the Angelicum chapel.
How can she continue to teach tha unknown cases of non Catholics saved with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) are objective exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
She violates  the Principle of  Non Contradiction of Aristotle.
Their same bad reasoning is used this semester, by other professors at the Angelicum . The evidence is there in the Angelicum Handbook which can be read on line.
The professors, most of them Dominicans , interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
They  include  Michelt, Stancati, Weimann, Ellul, Rossi, Destivelle, Keramidas, Buckles, Bonino, Sullivan, Blankenhorn and Giordano.
These professors have received academic degrees in theology, by interpreting Vatican Council II falsely.They also teach in other departments, besides theology, like Social Sciences and Philosophy.
They all interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and in an unethical way.This includes the Dean of Theology, Sister Catherine Joseph Droste op.There is no denial or clarification from her. She agrees with me.-Lionel Andrades



 DECEMBER 30, 2019


I am not allowed to study philosophy or theology at the Angelicum University,Rome since I interpret Vatican Council II rationally .But non Catholics who do not accept Vatican Council II, are permitted to enroll, and proclaim my faith honestly.This is discrimination based upon religion


DECEMBER 30, 2019

Professors would violate the Principle of Non Contradiction of Aristotle and they would be teaching us about Aristotle and Plato



DECEMBER 29, 2019


Angelicum Dean of Theology will not comment


DECEMBER 26, 2019

Pope Francis' reference to 'the magisterium of Vatican Council II' is misleading since he only knows of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and ignores Vatican Council II( Feeneyite).He interprets all magisterial documents without Feeneyism (invisible cases are invisible)


DECEMBER 26, 2019


Pope Benedict has written another book for the dustbin like those many books on Vatican Council II which interpret the Council with a false premise to create a rupture with the ecclesiology of the monks over the centuries

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/12/pope-benedict-has-written-another-book.html

DECEMBER 6, 2019

 NOVEMBER 25, 2019

Patricia Hackett must also uphold a Catholic's right to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and have Christ as the center of all politics and laws in Amercia

NOVEMBER 5, 2019

These are great days- when I say that Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) like the traditionalist Brother Andre Marie MICM- and there is no denial from them. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/these-are-great-days-when-i-say-that.html 

NOVEMBER 4, 2019
Michael Sean Winters affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since if asked he would say that the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) and LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to invisible and not visible people in 2019. So they are not practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return and exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. I have sent him e-mails of these posts and there is no contradiction from him. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-affirms-strict.html

  NOVEMBER 3, 2019
Michael Sean Winters affirms Vatican Council II and also the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) since the Council supports Feeneyite EENS when it is interpreted rationally.The Council is Feeneyite.He agrees with me.When he supports Fr. Leonard Feeney on EENS he is not in schism since the Council does the same when interpreted rationally. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-affirms-vatican.html

_____________________
The National Catholic Reporter cannot keep posting  reviews of books on Vatican Council II,  in which the authors make the same mistake ( Graphics ) https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-cannot.html

FALSE PREMISE DEFINED  
Their false premise is:-
1. Invisible people are visible. 
2.Unknown case of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known.
3.The unknown case of the catechumen who desired the baptism of water but dies before he received it and is saved, is a personally known person.
4.There is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for us human beings.
5.We can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water.
6.We can physically see non Catholics in Heaven and on earth who are saved without 'faith and baptism'(AG 7).
7.There are non Catholics who are dead- men visible and walking  who are saved outside the Church.
8.There are known people in invincible ignorance through no fault of their own, who are saved.
9.There are some Anglicans and Protestants whom we know who are going to Heaven even though they are outside the Catholic Church.
10.There are some non Catholics whom we know, who are dead, and now are in Heaven, even though they were not Catholic.

 With the false premise there are 'objective exceptions' to EENS. There are visible exceptions to the Athanasius Creed, the Nicene Creed is changed, there is a new understanding of the Nicene Creed etc :-
1. The Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation is contradicted.
2. The Nicene Creed in which we say, 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' over the centuries referred  to only one known baptism, the baptism of water.The baptism of desire etc cannot be given to someone like the baptism of water.But now the understanding is ' I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins ( desire,blood and ignorance) and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'.
3. The Apostles Creed says ' we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church'. Over the centuries it was understood that the Holy Spirit guided the Catholic Church and taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.Now  unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, and LG 8, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are assumd to be objective examples of salvation outside the Church.
4.In the past three Church Councils defined the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the extraordinary Magisterium .It was an 'infallible teaching' for Pope Pius X( Letter of the Holy Offie 1949).Now it is obsolete with their being alleged known salvation outside the Church.
5.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church are interpreted with the false premise so they become a rupture with EENS( Feeneyite), the Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc.
6.With the false premise the Catechism of Pope Pius X contradict itself. It affirms the strict interpretation of EENS while invincible invincible ignorance is intepreted as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Chuch.Invincible ignorance is not seen as a hypothetical case only.
7.Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus, Ecclesia in Asia, Balamand Declaration  etc were all written upholding the false premise. They did not support exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. So in a subtle way they contradicted EENS(Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed etc. They did not support the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.They are Christological without the traditional ecclesiocentric ecclesiology. It's Christ without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
8. Traditional mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church is rejected. Since with the false premise, there is salvation outside the Church.
9.Inter faith marriages which are not Sacraments are common held.It is no more adultery. Since the non Catholic spouse could be saved outside the Church it is assumed. A posibility which could only be known to God is assumed to be a practical exception to EENS and a literally known case of salvation outside the Church in a personal case.
10. There is a new heretical ecclesiology at Holy Mass in all the rites and liturgies. The Latin Mass today does not have the same exclusivist ecclesiology of the Tridentine Rite Mass of the missionaries in the 16th century.

___________________________

NOVEMBER 20, 2019 
The National Catholic Reporter reviews of the books  by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on  Vatican Council II were flawed. The authors made  a mistake ( Graphics)  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporter-reviews.html
__________________________________________
NOVEMBER 20, 2019
The National Catholic Reporter's reviews of the books by Fr. Jared Wicks sj and Prof. Paul Lakeland on  Vatican Council II, were flawed.The authors had made a mistake. Vatican Council II was interpreted  by them with false reasoning.The NCR must admit it. Both authors read the Council superficially. Then they assumed hypothetical cases were objective exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church.  This is irrational. So the authors conclusions and those of the editors and correspondents of the NCR  were irrational, non traditional and an artifical rupture with Catholic theology and doctrines on salvation  etc. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-national-catholic-reporters-reviews.html 

 NOVEMBER 20, 2019 
 Massimo Faggioli and Michael Sean Winters liberalism was based on an irrational  interpretation of Vatican Council II.The National Catholic Reporter had two  books reviewed, which interpreted Vatican Council II with the superficial and false  reasoning.The books were authored by Paul Lakeland  and Fr. Jared Wicks sj.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/massimo-faggiolis-and-michael-sean.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Michael Sean Winters and Massimo Faggioli have converted ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/michael-sean-winters-and-massimo.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019

The Vatican websites in general have a mistake in   the interpretation of Vatican Council II.  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-vatican-websites-in-general-have.html
NOVEMBER 19, 2019
Image result for Photo Archbishop Lefebvre

 I am not a Lefebvrist or modernist from Boston College.Both groups interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/i-am-not-lefebvrist-or-modernist-fr

JULY 5, 2018

Image result for Photos Check it out

These points should be clarified by the religious communities who are in communication with the CDF and Ecclesia Dei.Ask them if everyone can interpret Vatican Council II and EENS as does the blogger on Lionel's Blog.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/these-points-should-be-clarified-by.html


JULY 5, 2018

Reiterate
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/reiterate.html

NOVEMBER 6, 2019

Image result for Logo Crux newsImage result for Logo Catholic reporter

Before the National Catholic Reporter, Crux, Commonweal, the Tablet and Catholic News Service publish reports on Vatican Council II or review books on the Council they are informed that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only in 2019. They are not real and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology, LG 16 and GS 22 are not practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus and there is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/before-national-catholic-reporter-crux.html

NOVEMBER 5, 2019

 

Before the Jesuits write new books on Vatican Council II someone has to inform them that LG 8, LG 14,LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases only in 2019 and they are not real and known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So Lumen Gentium does not contradict the past ecclesiology, LG 16 and GS 22 are not practical exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and there is nothing in Unitatis Redintigratio to contradict an ecumenism of return.   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/before-jesuits-write-new-books-on.html



 NOVEMBER 19, 2019


I am not a Lefebvrist or modernist from Boston College.Both groups interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/11/i-am-not-lefebvrist-or-modernist-from.html

 OCTOBER 5, 2019

Temi di ecclesiologiaDall'assemblea liturgica alla Chiesa. Una prospettiva teologica e spirituale


Prof.Giovanni Tangorra teaches an Ecclesiology course at St.John Lateran University, Rome : He interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism to create the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition -1



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)