Friday, April 28, 2017

It is confirmed at the Archdiocese of Palermo, Italy they use an irrational and false theology to interpret magisterial documents : Canon Law must apply

It is confirmed at the Archdiocese of Palermo, Italy that they are using an irrational and false theology to interpret magisterial documents.They will not use the theology of Feeneyism to interpret Vatican Council II, since then the Council will be in step with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation ( Feeneyite).
Archbishop Corrado Lorefice of Palermo who suspended Fr.Alessandro M.Minutella, a Parish Priest has no denial to a report sent to him and other officials of the diocese.1 Fr.Minutella criticized ' a false church' within the Catholic Church.
Image result for Photos Alessandro Minutella
The archbishop was asked to please affirm Catholic doctrine in accord with magisterial documents of the Catholic Church, including Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).It is now confirmed.He is unable to do it!
The statement e-mailed to him and posted on Twitter, Gloria TV and other media stated that if he cannot affirm the doctrines of the Catholic Fatih as a bishop then according to Canon Law he has no right to be a bishop. Please ask for a replacement for the diocese of Palermo.
He was asked if the Archdiocese could confirm if they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes.There is no denial from Palermo.
It was pointed out to him that as a Catholic layman I affirm the magisterial documents of the Catholic Church and it differs from him and that of the Archdiocese of Palermo.
1.I Lionel Andrades, as a Catholic affirm that 'All Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and other non Catholics,Protestants, Pentecostals,Orthodox Christians and other Christians, atheists and other non believers in God, need to formally enter the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism(Ad Gentes 7,Lumen Gentium 14 Vatican Council II)to avoid the fires of Hell and to go to Heaven .They all need to be incorporated into the Church with no known exceptions, according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus'.
I asked him to affirm the above magisterial teaching which is the same in the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II. He could not do so in public.
If Archbishop Corrado Palermo and the Auxiliary bishops of the diocese cannot affirm Catholic doctrines interpreted with rationality I had mentioned then for the sake of unity in the diocese, could they in conscience resign and ask for a replacement; ask for a bishop or priest, who affirms the Catholic Faith with integrity.
No one in the archdiocese has been able to refute what I have said theologically or doctrinally.
I mentioned in the statement :
2.I, Lionel Andrades, as a Catholic affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) in which Lumen Gentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Spes 22, Lumen Gentium 14 etc refer to  physically invisible cases; hypotetical cases and not people personally known in the present times.
Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please affirm this traditional doctrinal teaching of the Church.The issue here is doctrine and not pastoral approach or theological praxis.
3.I,Lionel Andrades affirm the Nicene Creed. When I say at Mass " I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' I mean one known baptism, the baptism of water.There are not three known  baptisms. The baptism of desire and blood cannot be administered like the baptism of water, they cannot be physically seen or repeated like the baptism of water.The baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are always physically invisible for us in 2017.Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please affirm this Catholic teaching  with rationality and advise every one in the diocese to do the same.

4.I, Lionel Andrades, accept the baptism of desire as being a hypothetical case, irrespective if it is theoretically followed by the baptism of water or excludes it.The baptism of desire is always invisible and never visible for us human beings.So it cannot be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in 2017. An alleged possibility in the past cannot  be an exception to all needing to enter the Church with faith and baptism in 2017.
Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please clarify that they affirm the baptism of desire as being invisible and not visible and that it never was and nor is an exception to the interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,as it was guided by the Holy Spirit and the magisterium in  past centuries, for example, the missionaries of the 16th century.
5.I, Lionel Andrades do not affirm Vatican Council II with Cushingism, in which the baptism of desire is always visible and so it becomes an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is heresy.Yet this is the heretical doctrine being taught in the Archdiocese of Palermo.Could the Archdiocese of Palermo please formally reject the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism and clarify this issue for their lay congregations and diocesan religious.
If Archbishop Corrado Palermo cannot affirm these teachings of the Catholic Church then could the archdiocese confirm it. Could they confirm that they have been teaching doctrinal heresy all these years supported by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the two popes.
If Archbishop Corrado Palermo and the Auxiliary bishops of the diocese cannot affirm Catholic doctrines interpreted with rationality then for the sake of unity in the diocese, could they in conscience resign and ask for a replacement; ask for a bishop or priest, who affirms the Catholic Faith with integrity.'-Lionel Andrades

1.
APRIL 18, 2017

Archdiocese of Palermo please formally affirm Catholic doctrine for the religious and lay congregation of the diocese

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/archdiocese-of-palermo-please-formally.html

_______________________________________________________________________________



TERMS EXPLAINED


A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water. 

Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water. 

I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the two popes and the cardinals do so with Cushingism (so does the SSPX).

I use Feeneyism and Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Muller, Bishop Bernard Fellay, Bishop Mark Pirvanus, Bishop Donald Sanborn and the sedevacantists Michael and Peter Dimond use Cushingism.


For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Vatican Council II is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.



For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For the Dimond Brothers extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Feeneyite but they reject the baptism of desire which is Cushingite for them.

For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston is Feeneyite (in the first half) and for them it is Cushingite.

I avoid the New Theology, while they uses it. 

For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite. 

The present magisterium separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.I do not do so.

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS. 

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times. 

Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS. 

Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance. 

Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational. 

Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.

Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS. 

Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell). 

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite

Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite): It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions. 

Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite): It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter. 

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.

Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.

Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) : It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation. 

New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.


Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell. 


Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite). 

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions. 

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments. 
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvation.

Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Council of Trent : A Feeneyite does not separate the baptism of water from the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire will be followed by the baptism of water.
Council of Trent : A Cushingite separates the baptism of water from the baptism of desire. The baptism of desire excludes the baptism of water.
________________________



April 18, 2017

Boston Heresy of the magisterium has practical consequences today : Abp.Corrado Lorefice interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/boston-heresy-of-magisterium-has.html


Image result for Photo of the Catholic cathedral in Palermo

Sit-in dei fedeli di Minutella davanti alla Curia: “Arcivescovo, lasci don Alessandro in parrocchia”
April 16, 2017









Gospel today : Five loaves and two fishes

Gospel

Friday of the Second Week of Easter
Lectionary: 271   

April 28, 2017

 

John 6:1-15

Jesus went across the Sea of Galilee.
A large crowd followed him,
because they saw the signs he was performing on the sick.
Jesus went up on the mountain,
and there he sat down with his disciples. 
The Jewish feast of Passover was near.
When Jesus raised his eyes and saw that a large crowd was coming to him,
he said to Philip, "Where can we buy enough food for them to eat?"
He said this to test him,
because he himself knew what he was going to do.
Philip answered him,
"Two hundred days' wages worth of food would not be enough
for each of them to have a little."
One of his disciples,
Andrew, the brother of Simon Peter, said to him,
"There is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish;
but what good are these for so many?"
Jesus said, "Have the people recline." 
Now there was a great deal of grass in that place. 
So the men reclined, about five thousand in number.
Then Jesus took the loaves, gave thanks,
and distributed them to those who were reclining,
and also as much of the fish as they wanted.
When they had had their fill, he said to his disciples,
"Gather the fragments left over,
so that nothing will be wasted."
So they collected them,
and filled twelve wicker baskets with fragments
from the five barley loaves that had been more than they could eat.
When the people saw the sign he had done, they said,
"This is truly the Prophet, the one who is to come into the world." 
Since Jesus knew that they were going to come and carry him off
to make him king,
he withdrew again to the mountain alone.










Candidates with a religious vocation in the Diocese of Madison have to accept that the baptism of desire refers to cases physically visible in 2017.


 






Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reasoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( EENS)There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949
 
Candidates with a religious vocation in the Diocese of Madison have to accept that the baptism of desire refers to cases physically visible in 2017.Then they have to infer that these cases exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and so they are exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, as it was known to the magisterium in the 16th century.


Seminarians who intend to be priests in the diocese of Bishop Robert C.Morlino have to affirm that they can physically see people now in Heaven who are there without Catholic faith and the baptism of water and are there instead with the baptism of desire or blood or saved in invincible ignorance.
Young men who have dedicated their lives to become priests in Madison, Wisconsin must pledge that they could know people on earth in 2017 who will go to Heaven even though they are not members of the Catholic Church. 
Then need to pledge, since this is acceptable to all, that they would  know of people on earth, non Catholics, who will go to Heaven without 'faith and baptism '(AG 7) in the Catholic Church.
These are the vocation requirements in Madison and the rest of the USA.It is also the theology approved by the Vatican for religious vocations in other countries.

 
 
These young men when they teach school children in the diocese also have to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church assuming invisible cases of the baptism of desire are visible.
Similarly when they explain Vatican Council II in catechism classes they must insist that LG 16, LG 8,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer not to hypothetical cases but defacto known persons in the present times, who are explicit exceptions to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.This is the doctrinal requirement for vocations in the diocese and they are being met by Bishop Robert C.Morlino.
 
He offers the Traditional Latin Mass with the new ecclesiology based on invisible people being visible.So magisterial documents are a rupture with Tradition, in particular , the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation and the Syllabus of Errors.
The bishops suggests seminarians and priest affirm that the dead now in Heaven are visible and known in general in personal cases.Or, their ghosts can be confirmed in Wisconsin.
It is upon this objective error,this violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction that seminarians have to base their philosophy and theology.
-Lionel Andrades
 
 
 

November 19, 2011


 
November 17, 2011

VOCATION DIRECTOR IN SOUTHWARK,ENGLAND SAYS CANDIDATES WITH A RELIGIOUS VOCATION WOULD HAVE TO HOLD TO THE TEACHING ‘SUMMARISED BY THE LATIN EXPRESSION EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS’

 
 
April 27, 2015

Vocations to the religous life have to accept an irrationality in the Catechism of the Catholic Church

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/vocations-to-religous-life-have-to.html
 
 
February 25, 2013

Vocations in Sydney

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/vocations-in-sydney.html
 
July 12, 2012
VOCATIONS IN BOSTON ?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/vocations-in-boston.html
 
 
October 20, 2012
October 20, 2012

Archbishop Jose Octavio Ruiz unaware of error in the affirmation of the Nicene Creed : address to Catholic Fraternity of Charismatic Covenant Communities and Fellowships

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/archbishop-jose-octavio-ruiz-unaware-of.html
 
 
October 20, 2012

From Charismatics to the SSPX they all assume there are known exceptions to the credal teaching.It's 'I believe in three baptisms and not one'.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/charismatics-to-sspx-they-all-assume.html
 
 
October 19, 2012

CLARIFICATION FROM THE SSPX NEEDED

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/clarification-from-sspx-needed.html
 

SSPX IS CONTRADICTING THE NICENE CREED : THEY BELIEVE IN TWO OR MORE 'KNOWN' BAPTISMS FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SIN
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/sspx-is-contradicting-nicene-creed-they.html#links
 
 
____________________________________
 
 
April 27, 2017
Image result for Photo Boston Heresy case

Diocese of Madison must let school children know that they can interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism or Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/diocese-of-madison-must-let-school.html
 
 
April 26, 2017

Diocese of Madison needs to choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism in the interpretation of magisterial documents

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/diocese-of-madison-needs-to-choose.html

 
 
April 25, 2017
Bishop Robert C.Morlino needs to interpret the Catechism with Feeneyism then the laity can do the same in study groups
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/bishop-robert-cmorlino-needs-to.html
 
 
 
April 24, 2017
Tracy Rowland, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf and Bishop Morlino in the Diocese of Madison, USA are 'doing theology' with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism

 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/tracy-rowland-fr-john-zuhlsdorf-and.html

 
 
 
 

Bishop Fellay does not realize that he is confused between Feeneyism and Cushingism

The dogma “Outside the Church there is no salvation” has been changed surreptitiously by confused ideas wrote Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX).1 He does not realize that it is he, who is confused between Cushingism and Feeneyism in the interpretation of the dogma. That same confusion he extends to Vatican Council II.He then makes the same error in the interpretation of the Catechism of Pope Pius X and the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995).

Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.

Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.


 Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949Image result for Photos Letter of the Holy Office 1949
 So when he interprets invincible ignorance in the Catechism of Pope Pius X he assumes it refers to a visible case and so is an exception to outside the Church no salvation ( Feeneyite).
When I interpret invincible ignorance for example, in the Catechism of Pope Pius X it refers to an invisible case.
For Father Pier Paulo Petrucci, Superior, SSPX, Italy the baptism of desire refers to a visible case. So Vatican Council II has a rupture with the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation( Feeneyite).He is a Cushingite like Bishop Bernard Fellay.
For me Lionel, the baptism of desire and blood with or without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church refers to a physically invisible case. So it cannot be relevant or an exception to the dogma EENS, as it was known to the 16th century missionaries.2 
Bishop Bernard Fellay could also clarify that I Lionel Andrades interpret Vatican Council II without an irrational premise and so my conclusion is different from his and the SSPX bishops and priests.It is the same with the dogma EENS.
 This is Vatican Council II Feeneyite for me with these diagrams.

-Lionel Andrades

1.
2.
January 12, 2016
Image result for Photo of Fr. Pier Paolo Petrucci

If the SSPX bishops and Fr.Pierpaulo Petrucci would admit that the baptism of desire refers to invisible cases in 2016, the entire interpretation of Vatican Council changes : error in the article



Fr. Pier Paolo Petrucci, Superior General,SSPX ,Italy makes the familiar SSPX error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/fr-pier-paolo-petrucci-superior.html
JULY 20, 2015

No response from Fraternita Sacerdotale San Pio X (SSPX Italy) : doctrinal mess http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/no-response-from-fraternita-sacerdotale.html

 ________________________________________________________

October 18, 2012

FATHER NIKLAUS PFLUGER IN FIRST CLASS HERESY ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/father-niklaus-pfluger-in-first-class.html

 

 

October 19, 2012

RAMPANT HERESY IN THE SSPX

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/rampant-heresy-in-sspx.html




SSPX DISTRICT ITALY CONFERENCE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II TO USE THE FALSE PREMISE
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/sspc-district-italy-conference-


October 17, 2012
Our Lady of Akita Japan

Will Bishop Bernard Fellay give up Church teachings to protect the SSPX?

Vatican Council II can be accepted by the SSPX in accord with the dogma extra eccleesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.This will be a Vatican Council without  the visible dead theory. It will be the Jewish Left who will oppose this interpretation of Vatican Council. Vatican Council II would be anti Semitic.

At Akita,  Our Lady told the seer that there will come a time when bishops will be against bishops and cardinals against cardinals. At Fatima she said the Faith will be lost (except in Portugal). Rome will lose the Faith, she said, at La Salle.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/10/will-bishop-bernard-fellay-give-up.html

 





___________________________________________________________________
April 2, 2017

Fr. Alessandro M.Minutella critical of Vatican Council II (Cushingite) suspended : Fellay condones Cushingism in exchange for status the popular Palermo priest lost

November 4, 2016

Bishop Bernard Fellay interprets Vatican Council II with the irrational premise and conclusion : there is an option, a rational conclusion of which he is unaware of. http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/11/bishop-bernard-fellay-interprets.html

September 25, 2016

Bishop Fellay's understanding and interpretation of Vatican Council II is heretical.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/the-letter-of-holy-office-1949-has_25.html
September 11, 2016

Cardinal Muller, Archbishop Di Noia and Bishop Fellay's theology is based on invisible cases being visible, what is not seen as being seen

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/cardinal-muller-archbishop-di-noia-and.html
June 14, 2016

SSPX doctrinal position is politically correct and heretical : Bishop Fellay interprets EENS and Vatican Council II assuming hypothetical cases are objectively known in the present times.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/sspx-doctrinal-position-is-politically.html
June 11, 2016

Apologists Mons. Clifford Fenton, Fr.William Most and Fr. John Hardon considered implicit cases as being explicit: traditionalists agree any one who does this is wrong http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/apologists-mons-clifford-fenton.html

____________________________________________
CARDINAL GERHARD MULLER : MISTAKES HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES AS BEING EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES.
Related image
That has been discussed, but here, too, there has been a development of all that was said in the Church, beginning with St. Cyprian, one of the Fathers of the Church, in the third century. Again, the perspective is different between then and now. In the third century, some Christian groups wanted to be outside the Church, and what St. Cyprian said is that without the Church a Christian cannot be savedThe Second Vatican Council also said this: Lumen Gentium 14 says: “Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.” He who is aware of the presence of Revelation is obliged by his conscience to belong publicly — and not only in his conscience, in his heart — to this Catholic Church by remaining in communion with the Pope and those bishops in communion with him.
But we cannot say that those who are inculpably ignorant of this truth are necessarily condemned for that reason. We must hope that those who do not belong to the Church through no fault of their own, but who follow the dictates of their God-given conscience, will be saved by Jesus Christ whom they do not yet know. Every person has the right to act according to his or her own conscience. - Cardinal Gerhard Muller (10/02/2012 ). Archbishop Gerhard Müller: 'The Church Is Not a Fortress', National Catholic Register  http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-mueller-the-church-is-not-a-fortress/#ixzz3pwkg3Mur

ARCHBISHOP AUGUSTINE DO NOIA : ASSUMES WHAT IS KNOWN ONLY TO GOD CAN BE KNOWN AND JUDGED BY US HUMAN BEINGS.


I don’t know if you can blame this on the Council so much as the emergence of a theological trend that emphasized the possibility of salvation of non-Christians. But the Church has always affirmed this, and it has never denied it. …The Council did say there are elements of grace in other religions, and I don’t think that should be retracted. I’ve seen them, I know them — I’ve met Lutherans and Anglicans who are saints.' - Archbishop Augustine di Noia ( 07/01/2012 ), Archbishop Di Noia, Ecclesia Dei and the Society of St. Pius X, National Catholic Register.


http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/archbishop-dinoia-ecclesia-dei-and-the-society-of-st.-pius-x/#ixzz3Q1Vx3byR


___________________________

 BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY  ASSUMES THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES KNOWN ONLY TO GOD ARE EXPLICIT IN THE PRESENT TIMES AND RELEVANT TO EENS

LAB_82 
The same declaration (LG, 8) also recognizes the presence of “salvific elements” in non-Catholic Christian communities. The decree on ecumenism goes even further, adding that “the Spirit of Christ does not refrain from using these churches and communities as means of salvation, which derive their efficacy from the fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church.” (UR, 3)
Such statements are irreconcilable with the dogma “No salvation outside of the Church, which was reaffirmed by a Letter of the Holy Office on August 8, 1949". -Bishop Bernard Fellay  (April 13, 2014 ) Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82
http://www.dici.org/en/documents/letter-to-friends-and-benefactors-no-82/

________________________________________________________

Here are the controversial passages again


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/here-are-controversial-passages-again.html


___________________________________________________________


Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links


 CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF



How can zero cases of something be considered exceptions ?- John Martignoni http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/sspx-only-way-out-now.html#links 

Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigioni http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/implicit-intention-invincible-ignorance.html 

OCTOBER 16, 2013

DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/dean-of-theology-at-st-anselm-says.html

________________________________________________

Bishop Bernard Fellay made a factual mistake in Letter to Friends and Benefactors no. 82 : we cannot see the dead http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/bishop-bernard-fellay-has-made-factual.html#links

____________________________________
April 26, 2017
Diocese of Madison needs to choose Feeneyism instead of Cushingism in the interpretation of magisterial documents http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/diocese-of-madison-needs-to-choose.html

Diocese of Madison must let school children know that they can interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism or Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/04/diocese-of-madison-must-let-school.html
____________________________________


http://sspx.org/en/publications/letters/april-2017-letter-friends-and-benefactors-87-29356