Friday, September 6, 2019
Speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference(CIC) are in schism with the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc.They interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to maintain the common schism with the Left. In this way they remain speakers at these conferences.
Speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference(CIC) are in schism with the past Magisterium on EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc.They interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise to maintain the common schism with the Left. In this way they remain speakers at these conferences.
I have repeated this many times and they do not deny it every year.Some of them are professional Catholics, who use words like 'traditionalists' to describe themselves but are in manifest mortal sins of faith.
They talk about the importance of doctrine but interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) as referring to known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without faith and baptism.Then this irrationality is applied in principle to all magisterial documents to elicit a rupture with Tradition, which keeps them afloat financially.Since the schism is enforced by the Left.
If they did not affirm BOD, BOB and I.I irrationally they would be proclaiming traditional Feeneyite EENS, the past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return and the Syllabus of Errors.They would no more be modernist. This would put them at odds with a schismatic Catholic Church.The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the present two popes, the non Catholic Left, USCCB, Bishops Conferences, SSPX, Una Voce, Latin Mass Societies etc are a part of it.
-Lionel Andrades
Dr.Taylor Marshall supported Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, along with Bishop Olsen and the FSSP priests at the Fisher More College. He opposed Dr. Dudley and the faculty, which correctly rejected Vatican Council II( Cushingite). Until today he does not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite); the Council interpreted rationally in harmony with Tradition.He is a speaker at the controversial Catholic Identity Conference, where the criteria for being being a Catholic speaker is being approved by the political Left.
Dr.Taylor Marshall supported Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, along with Bishop Olsen and the FSSP priests at the Fisher More College. He opposed Dr. Dudley and the faculty, which correctly rejected Vatican Council II( Cushingite). Until today he does not affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite); the Council interpreted rationally in harmony with Tradition.He is a speaker at the controversial Catholic Identity Conference, where the criteria for being being a Catholic speaker is being approved by the political Left.
Traditionalists who are sedevacantists cannot speak at the CIC and neither can those who affirm Feeneyite EENS and reject BOD, BOB and I.I as being practical exceptions to EENS. Only those Catholics are allowed to speak who interpret invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I, as being visible exceptions to EENS.
Since with this irrationality a schism is created with the past popes before Pius XII, on EENS, Athanasius Creed,Nicene Creed, past ecclesiology, past ecumenism,Syllabus of Errors, mission based on exclusive salvation in the Church etc. The CIC speakers meet all thse heretical and schismatic conditions of the Left.
There can be no uniting the clans with the traditionalists in Bishop Richard Williamson's community.Chris Ferrara and Michael Matt have to stay financially correct.
How can the speakers have a Catholic Identity when they reject EENS as it was known to the missionaries and Magisterium in the 16th century?
-Lionel Andrades
Chris Ferrara supports the schism from the Left, he is a part of it.
Chris Ferrara supports the schism from the Left, he is a part of it.He does not affirm Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) but chooses the Cushingite variety. So he is not Anti Semitic and is permitted by the Left, as a speaker at the Catholic Identity Conference(CIC) next month in the USA.Usually the speakers at the CIC, Lepanto, Roman Forum and Angelus Conference affirm Cushingite EENS and Cushingite baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I).
So with Cushingite BOD, BOB and I.I, LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc, Vatican Council II emerges as a rupture with the past exclusvist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.So Ferrara remains politically correct with the Masons, liberals, ecclesiastics and the SSPX.He will not say BOD, BOB and I.I are simply invisible and not exceptions to EENS. This would be dis-inviting himself to these conferences.
For political reasons he will not say Lumen Gentium did not contradict 16th century EENS.Instead all these years, he has been saying the opposite.It does contradict EENS for him!So LG 8, LG 16 etc are exceptions to EENS.Vatican Council II contradicts EENS. He wrote books with this mistake.
He is as schismatic as Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj who projected LG 8 as an exception to the past exclusive salvation ( Placuet Deo Press Conference).
Ferrara will not affirm Feeneyite EENS i.e hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are not literal examples of salvation outside the Church.So there are no practical exceptions to EENS.Invisible people cannot be exceptions.
Instead his understanding of EENS is Cushingite like that of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre i.e hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I are literal and objective exceptions to EENS.
So he makes it clear for the USCCB, the CDF,the SSPX etc, that he does not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS.He is not a Feeneyite.
All these years Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery(MHFM) affirmed Feeneyite EENS.Meanwhile Jimmy Akins and EWTN apologists projected invisible BOD, BOB and I.I as visible exceptions to EENS.They chose Cushingism.Ferrara supported EWTN and Catholic Answers.
Since he is politically correct the liberals and the Left allow him to speak at conferences. The Fatima Center has also adapted. They no more have a Rapid Response Team or affirm Feeneyite EENS.
Chris Ferrara is part of the general establishment-schism with the popes over the centuries on EENS, past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return etc.The popes had affirmed Feeneyite EENS along with Feeneyite BOD, BOB and I.I.So there was the strict interpretation of EENS with BOD etc being only hypothetical.This is lost on Chris Ferrara.-Lionel Andrades
This is schism based upon doctrine and not just discipline or pastoral exercises
The priest at Mass yesterday evening- like Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), did not say that all non Catholics need to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church for salvation (AG 7, Vatican Council II). Instead he said in Italian 'Dio ha dato salvezza per tutti'( God has given salvation to all/ for all).At Abu Dhabi too the pope was saying God has given salvation to all.
This priest, like Pope Francis, interprets Vatican Council II mixing up what is invisible as visible, subjective as objective.So Lumen Gentium 8, 14 and 16 would refer to visible and known non Catholics saved outside the Church instead of invisible and theoretical cases , who if they existed would be known only to God.
So if there can be one alleged exception to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) , there can be two, or many, or most...
This is how Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II and then concludes that there is a reasonable hope that most men are saved.
Bishop Barron interprets Vatican Council II like the present two popes and the traditionalists.
It is the same for Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, John Henry Weston, Bradley Eli, Christine Niles and the EWTN apologists.
Salvation is open to all in potential but to receive this salvation a person must respond. Even the Protestants believe that a person must respond with faith in Jesus.
St. Faustina Kowalska says God is merciful and his mercy is there for all.She also says God is just.So to receive this mercy a Catholic must respond with repentance, the Divine Mercy Prayer, a change from a life of sin etc.
Instead this young priest phrased his sentence in such a way as to say that all will be saved even if they do not accept Jesus in the Catholic Church; without faith and baptism(AG 7).
There is a schism in the Church approved by the Left.Doctrinally, it is a negation of EENS with an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.It is done with an irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance. They are invisible cases but are projected as being visible and personally known. Then it is assumed that there are objective exceptions to EENS, exclusivist ecclesiolgy, ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed on outside the Church there is no salvation, the Syllabus of Errors and a new understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed.This is schism based on doctrine and not just discipline or pastoral excercises.
-Lionel Andrades
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
