Tuesday, July 26, 2016

So now we all can go back to the old theology by pointing out that BOD and I.I are always imaginary cases.Always : there must be 'a clear call to conversion'

So now we all can go back to the old theology by pointing out that BOD and I.I are always imaginary cases.Always.

We need to speak clearly about the Catholic Faith, proclaim it clearly and not let the traditionalists, liberals and sedevacantists cause confusion.

All non Catholics are going to Hell.Source? Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).Catholics are the new people of God, they are the new Chosen People( NA 4).They follow the Promised Jewish Messiah foretold by the Jewish prophets.They follow Him in the only Church he founded. There are only Catholics in Heaven. Outside the Church there is no salvation since outside the Church there is no known salvation.Related image
All Protestants,Orthodox Christians, Pentecostals, Assembly of God Christians and Jehovah Witnesses are on the way to Hell.Source? Dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.( Cantate Domino, Council of Trent 1441 etc).
All Hindus, Buddhists, Jews,Muslims and Sikhs are lost forever unless they convert into the Catholic Church before they die.Source? Vatican Council II(AG 7, LG 14), Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on outside the Church there is no salvation,John 3:5, Mark 16:16,Mathew 7:13-14) etc.-Lionel Andrades

There is no clear call to conversion from Louie Verrecchio since UR 3 is an exception to all needing to enter the Church to avoid Hell.He writes about a call to conversion on AKA Catholic.
There is no clear call to conversion being made by Fr.Anthony Cekada since the case of a catechumen who desired the baptism of water, died before he received it and went to Heaven is someone real. He is not an imaginary person .
There is no clear call to conversion from Bishop Donald Sanborn since the person who dies in invincible ignorance allegedly without the baptism of water, is not an imaginary case in 2016.

The  Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney also need to clarify their call to conversion.The  baptism of desire is an imaginary case. They need to say this clearly.
They need to  say  that LG 14 does not contradict itself i.e LG 14 ( unknown catechumen) does not contradict LG 14 ( all need faith and baptism).

Catholics need to proclaim the Faith with a clear call to conversion.-Lionel Andrades

Irish priest on 44th pilgrimage to Medugorje : young people don't want to leave!

Fruit of Medjugorje


Dear children! I am looking at you and I see you lost; and you do not have prayer or joy in your heart. Return to prayer, little children, and put God in the first place and not man.- Our Lady at Medugorje (July 25,2016)

July 25, 2016
“Dear children! I am looking at you and I see you lost; and you do not have prayer or joy in your heart. Return to prayer, little children, and put God in the first place and not man. Do not lose the hope which I am carrying to you. May this time, little children, every day, be a greater seeking of God in the silence of your heart; and pray, pray, pray until prayer becomes joy for you. Thank you for having responded to my call.”
A Moment With Mary



La Bambina che Vede la Madonna a Medjugorje

Devotion to the rosary is phenomenal at Medugorje says priest

Tea With Rosie


JUNE 8, 2016

Over 600 cases of healings in Medjugorje recorded and kept at Information center “Mir,” of the Franciscans of St. James parish in Medjugorje : Arthur Boyle healed of kidney cancer


Lame girl was healed during apparition in Medjugorje http://www.medjugorje.ws/en/articles/silvia-busi-healed-in-medjugorje/   http://www.maryslandmovie.org/project/silvia-buso-padua/

Medugorje : Irish priest with cancer healed completely 


Medjugorje Sun Miracles caught of film!!!

Medjugorje - Miracle of the Sun - May 2010 (1)



Catholics are making the transition : interpreting Vatican Council II differently

Science in Transition – An Agenda for ChangeIf the baptism of desire and blood and being saved in invincible ignorance and the 'seeds of the Word' are considered implicit for us instead of explicit in the flesh, then the interpretation of Vatican Council II completely changes.This is the view of many Catholics.This presents us with a new concept of Vatican Councl II and it shows that most of our constructs of Vatican Council II were wrong.They were structured on personally known, seen in the flesh cases of non Catholics saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So there was a rupture with the foundational dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, on which the old ecclesiology and general Tradition was situated.Now this simple and rational way of seeing Vatican Council II will come as a surprise to liberals and conservatives.It puts to rest  the way the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) interpreted Vatican Council II.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre their founder, was  a Cushingite.Cushingites interpret EENS  and Vatican Council II  with the pillars of physically known baptism of desire(BOD) etc.Cushingites,like Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston assume  hypothetical cases are not hypothetical in real life.This is the error which has de-railed Catholic theology. A new premise( known cases of BOD) and conclusion( known exceptions to traditional EENS) has taken the contemporary Church in a new direction, which the mainstream media calls 'revolutionary'.So Archbishop Lefebvre was correct in saying that the Council was a rupture with Tradition but he did not know of the specific cause which was responsible for this rupture.
Now with this small but important correction in theology, the Church is going back  to the teachings of the Church Fathers, the saints and many founders of religious communities, like St. Francis of Assisi, St. Dominic and St.Ignatius of Loyola.
It also means new opportunities are open for the reconciliation of the SSPX and the Vatican, which were not there a few years back.
Once the SSPX and even the sedevacantists make the transition to implicit for us baptism of desire(LG 14),invisible for us being  saved in invincible ignorance( LG 16), known only to God 'seeds of the Word'(AG 11), hypothetical 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8), theoretical  'imperfect communion with the Church'(UR 3) and explicit only for God  'a ray of that truth which enlightens all people'(NA 2)- they do not deny any text in Vatican Council II.They simply change the perspective.Where before they thought hypothetical cases were visibly known in 2016, they correct themself and admit that these superflous references to hypothetical cases are not known in reality, in 2016.
This in a sense has already been done in public.The SSPX's General Chapter Statement(2012) affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions.There were no explicit  exceptions to EENS, in Vatican Council II for that General Chapter meeting.So the transition has been made. It is for the Vatican Curia to acknowledge that the traditional Catholic doctrine on salvation,can be accepted without being tinted with irrational and innovative theology.-Lionel Andrades

July 25, 2016

Traditionalists need to make the transition to invisible for us baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.They will not be denying BOD and I.I but will be rationally choosing a hypothetical for us BOD and I.I.Then they can watch how Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church changes