School children in German Catholic schools are nottold the truth about Vatican Council II otherwise they would know that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 support the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) while hypothetical cases of LG 14 ( the baptism of desire) and LG 16 ( being saved in invincible ignorance) are not practical exceptions in the present times (1965-2022).The children grow up believing that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are practical exceptions for Tradition. -Lionel Andrades
MARCH 11, 2022
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria Prefect of the CDF is allowing the German Synodal Way to continue with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.A False Premise creates a false break with de fide teachings of the Catholic Church. This is public heresy and schism supported by the CDF. It is not magisterial.
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is allowing the German Synodal Way to continue with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II.A False Premise is used by the Germans to create a false break with de fide teachings of the Catholic Church. This is public heresy and schism supported by the CDF. It is not magisterial.
LG 8 LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always hypothetical. So they cannot be practical exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Syllabus of Errors and the Creeds and Catechisms. How can this be legal in Germany?
It is a lie to project LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc as being practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition.But vocations for the religious life in Germany, have to do just this.
In Rome I interpret all Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise (invisible people are invisible in 2022). The Society of St.Pius X in Italy and Germany, use the same False Premise as the German cardinals and bishops (invisible people are visible).
So for them LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to physically visible and personally known non Catholics saved without faith and the baptism of water in 1965-2022.Otherwise they could not be exceptions for extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc. They infer that these ‘objective examples’ of salvation outside the Church, are practical exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors etc.So the False Premise is followed by the False Inference.
So this is the New Theology based upon a False Premise which makes the Syllabus of Errors, EENS etc, obsolete. There is a false break with Tradition.
For me LG 8 etc are not practical exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism. Since hypothetical and theoretical cases cannot be practical exceptions in 2022, with Tradition (EENS etc).There is no hermeneutic of discontinuity with Tradition for me.
So we all affirm Church Documents but they interpret them with the invisible- people- are- visible- confusion and I avoid it. For them Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition and for me it is not. Their conclusion is non-traditional, heretical and schismatic. Mine is orthodox without a rupture between faith and reason, without ‘the development of doctrine’ and without the common liberalism.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/03/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-prefect-of-cdf-is.html
Posts
